Originally posted by: Ctrl-Alt-Del
Untruthful not in the sense that she was telling lies.. but her argument was not correct completely.. when Gaurav said that four important things happened during the task and you were not there so I had to tell you the details last night.. then in response she said that I listened to what you said, thet I listened to what Manveer said and then to take a neutral point of view I talked to Sahil as well.. it was good but not good enough.. because mostly competitors will say that they're right and the person you chose as a neutral spectator could do a mistake too because most of the time spectators of any task keep talking to each other, looking here and there while some task is happening.. they don't need to watch it with full concentration as they don't have to take the decision in the end.. she was sanchalak and she should be there till the end and especially when task was reaching to the end.. 'should I pee in the pant?' is not a very convincing argument imo.. but as in the end the decision she took was fair so all's well that ends well.. but my point was just that if you're articulate then it never means that the ground of your argument is also based on solid logic and facts..But I do agree with her on the point of Om Swami Ji because he'll do something every week so making him sit on that chair not only seem an easy option but also boring and repetitive for viewers too..
comment:
p_commentcount