Today, post Krushna's first act Shalin was talking about how it hurts when people call him an overactor. Nothing wrong in this, till he uses Charlie Chaplin as an example to prove that if you do something long enough it becomes a part of your personality and true nature. Now this I can't take.
1) If you watch Charlie Chaplin's real life interview not once does he repeat his onscreen mannerisms. His real life mannerism was completely different from the one he portrayed in his films.
2) If that analogy does hold true, then if you look at Shalin's work graph then he has played an onscreen villain majority of times, not a comic. Unless he means to say that just because he overacted in majority of his tv serials that nature seeped in his personality, now that can be accepted. In fact, there are tonnes of examples in real life where an actors on-screen personality had no connection whatsoever with his/her offscreen real persona.
C'mon Shalin, make a better case for yourself 😆
comment:
p_commentcount