Contribution since ankit left & way ahead ?? - Page 2

Originally posted by: AreYaar

EXACTLY😆....toh phir kis angle se Ankit ko "furniture" bolte hain log? LOL the bullshit excuses they gave to plot his eviction become all the more laughable then.....He DID impact the game because others were so dependent on him for their game....especially those who wanted to provoke Pri😆. Phir upar se Ankit started destroying their narratives with his one-liners also, toh aur aag lag gayi😆

My point is simply that that there was never any truth to the narratives about Ankit's supposed lack of contribution in the house when TILL DATE people are taking his name in connection to pretty much EVERYONE in the house😆.....Log bolte the Pri needed him to survive in the game, but heck Ankit ko gaye 3 weeks ho gaye and losers like Soun seem to need Ankit's name more to survive in the game as a part of their lame comebacks😆.

In all honesty, Ankit’s contribution in the house was less. Definitely not the least and he did not deserve the way he was evicted, but overall he did not have a game. He is not the right person for BB I feel, kinda like Hiten from S11. If he had come alone without Priyanka, I don’t see him coming this far, as he would rarely voice out his opinions because of his introverted nature. But it can not be denied that Sumbul and Stan deserved a lesser in time than Ankit, so he was definitely robbed of that.

Originally posted by: R.G.C

In all honesty, Ankit’s contribution in the house was less. Definitely not the least and he did not deserve the way he was evicted, but overall he did not have a game. He is not the right person for BB I feel, kinda like Hiten from S11. If he had come alone without Priyanka, I don’t see him coming this far, as he would rarely voice out his opinions because of his introverted nature. But it can not be denied that Sumbul and Stan deserved a lesser in time than Ankit, so he was definitely robbed of that.

Now you're just generalizing the argument again😆....that's not the point. I'm talking about CONTEXT.....the CONTEXT of why Ankit alone was targeted so much for "involvement" when WHOLE MANDLI was basically a freeloader - especially jokers like Sumbul who think they did so much more than Ankit😆.

There are many factors and personalities that go into making a BB season.....some people open up with time and get stronger in the game while others are extroverted off the bat. The whole reason the topic of Ankit will not be let go is because of BB's glaring hypocrisy in how they treated him when he clearly demonstrated he had a mind to understand the game and decode most things that were going on. He was also participating in all the tasks and duties around the house. Yes, if he had come without Priyanka he would have probably bothered even less with interacting with people but that doesn't change the point that he DID interact and build friendships of his own in the house too....so why was all that invalidated on a blanket level to evict him through HM votes? That too the votes of people who have done nothing in the house but lounged around in the mandli? Obviously any sane person will call out this bullshit....one doesn't need to be an Ankit fan to see the obvious.

Originally posted by: AreYaar

Now you're just generalizing the argument again😆....that's not the point. I'm talking about CONTEXT.....the CONTEXT of why Ankit alone was targeted so much for "involvement" when WHOLE MANDLI was basically a freeloader - especially jokers like Sumbul who think they did so much more than Ankit😆.

There are many factors and personalities that go into making a BB season.....some people open up with time and get stronger in the game while others are extroverted off the bat. The whole reason the topic of Ankit will not be let go is because of BB's glaring hypocrisy in how they treated him when he clearly demonstrated he had a mind to understand the game and decode most things that were going on. He was also participating in all the tasks and duties around the house. Yes, if he had come without Priyanka he would have probably bothered even less with interacting with people but that doesn't change the point that he DID interact and build friendships of his own in the house too....so why was all that invalidated on a blanket level to evict him through HM votes? That too the votes of people who have done nothing in the house but lounged around in the mandli? Obviously any sane person will call out this bullshit....one doesn't need to be an Ankit fan to see the obvious.

Uhhh, first of all please calm down a bit! I am not anti-Ankit or anything. I liked Ankit as a person, but did not find him suitable for the game. And why he was eliminated, even I am saying it was unfair and that there were people who deserved to go out before him. But what I believe happened is that the game had become quite one sided as most of the focus and storyline was getting built across Priyanka at that point, so Ankit’s eviction would mean Priyanka maybe cooling down a bit for some days and other players would have gotten chance to shine during that phase, that is what they might have thought. And other than that we already had rumors that he was getting signed for a project with Ravi-Sargun PH, so Ankit’s BB popularity would automatically bring fame to the show too which is also to air on colors. Evicting Sumbul would be of no use because she is not a colors face. They would not have evicted Stan too because he brings audience for BB from a completely different genre. Evicting Ankit was not a loss to the channel as post BB he was anyways going to a show within the same channel, so his popularity could still be used. And these 3 were the lesser active contestants (although I also feel Nimmo is also part of the less active group, but she is a different case altogether as there is a clear bias by the channel for her) the channel could not let go of the others.

its sal's fault....

but the only good thing is all 3 shiv pri n arch doing tasks well n hv ability to clearly voice out which others lack