Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika
Now coming to any family owned business or company.
If it is an enterprise employing people, the company is responsible for the financial integrity and well bring of the company notwithstanding personal relations.
Just because the spouse or any family member may have more access to the company finances, does NOT give freedom to utilise it. Should anyone misuse or excessively use them, the company, on the direction of the head should enforce restrictions and guardrails against misuse of power and finances.
Professional obligations do NOT protect personal financial independence.
Post wedding, a wife has right to the personal wealth or earnings of the husband but no right is absolute in nature. Should the husband suspect misuse of his wealth, he can and should enforce caution and protection.
Case in point:
Anuj had given an add-on card from the Company (substantiated by the fact that bills were sent to Anuj-Anupama at office for review) to Pakhi which was misused or indiscriminately used. The Accounts department raised this and sent the bills over to Anuj-Anupama's for review and approval.
Refer the episode when Anupama disrespectfully throws the cut credit card at Anuj questioning him on why he gave her the card or not stop ger from usage, he says he thought she was at office when the Accounts department brought it to their notice. (Anyway, one has to go to office or work to know if there are complains/issues. But that is another matter.)
You know giving family members access to company funds has to be audited or would be credited as tax evasion and money laundering? It has nothing to do with wife's rights. All spending has to be accounted. If Adhya instead of Pakhi got the credit card, hypothetically, the consequences would have been the same. And if Pakhi were Anuj's bio kid, the consequences would have been the same. Anuj gave Pakhi a credit card; she being a spendthrift and a brat, misused it.
How that proves anything apart from Pakhi being spoilt is beyond me. Anuj knew of Pakhi's issues and could've put restrictions on her as a parental figure. What does this even prove; that he doesn't know how to set boundaries with any of his family members?
Anupamaa is constantly shamed for not loving (Anuj's) adopted kid as much as (Vanraj's) bio kid as if they are not her children too. But if Anuj does anything for (Anupamaa's) kids then he is being conned by Shah kids and Anupamaa is a golddigger as if they were not his step children as well.
So basically a woman has to love an adopted kid wholeheartedly (rightly so, don't adopt kids if you can't be a decent human being), but a man has no emotional obligation towards his step kids because they are not his DNA? And adulthood is the difference?Anuj won't spend anything on Adhya once she hits 18?
Make it make sense.
comment:
p_commentcount