Posted:
Originally posted by: shridevigaddam
Angel,When I read this post, I was saying to myself. Oh! Angel did you read that other post of mine? May be you read it and you didn't like. Lekin ho sakta hai you might not have read...so posting the link here. Its sort of my suggestions.And 100% agree with those two quotes. Yehi to main kah rahi thi. Want entertainment and drama with no dullness. All silliness will be forgiven by me if I just get entertained. As per my mental level of course!! 😆And thanks for your kind words.Shridevi
I did read that post. I liked the bolded part of your post most.
Also I would like to state , make the antagonists as strong as the protagonist not silly!
My argument is that are we ready to see something like Jim Carreys 1991 movie High Strung on Indian TV.
In the film Jim Carrey plays the central character of "Thane Furrows, who spends the day messing around his apartment
and complaining about a number of random subjects like (among other things) flies, popsicles, junk mail, his boss' wife,
his upstairs neighbor, smoking, salesmen,and philosophizes on a number of things such as the morality of eating humans
and the sensibility of keeping pets."
To conclude I am saying that a movie can't describe a taste. We need a character to tell us what the taste is then only we know that the rice he is eating is too sour or too salty.
Juxtaposition is good when it is good but we also need action to carry forward the story.
comment:
p_commentcount