Judge acted judiciously without any bias, says Court while rejecting Kangana's plea in defamation case
The court while rejecting Kangana's plea in defamation case has said that, "Judge acted judiciously without any bias". The actor had filed a transfer petition last month, saying that she had “lost faith” in the Andheri metropolitan magistrate’s court.
Published: Saturday,Oct 23, 2021 07:44 AM GMT-06:00
The additional chief metropolitan magistrate court here has held that the Andheri metropolitan magistrate, which is presiding over the defamation case filed by lyricist Javed Akhtar against Bollywood actress Kangana Ranaut, has acted "judiciously" and did not show any bias against the actor.
Just because the court proceeds with the case by following the procedure of law, it does not mean that it is biased against the applicant, additional chief metropolitan magistrate S T Dande said in her order in which she rejected Ranaut's plea that sought transfer of the case to some other court.
The additional chief metropolitan magistrate had rejected Ranaut's petition on October 21, but its detailed order was made available on Saturday.
The actor had filed the transfer petition last month, saying that she had "lost faith" in the Andheri metropolitan magistrate's court as it indirectly "threatened" her of issuing a warrant if she failed to appear before it in a bailable offence.
The petition also alleged that the court was biased against her.
However, Dande, in her order, ruled that the metropolitan magistrate, 10th court, Andheri, has given a fair opportunity to the accused to remain absent by granting all her exemption applications.
"I have perused all the orders passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri. He has passed the orders judiciously", she said.
Moreover, the order passed by the Andheri court was confirmed by the sessions court.
Further, the high court had dismissed Ranaut's plea seeking quashing of the criminal defamation proceedings initiated against her by the magistrate, the court said.
It further held that the case cannot be transferred from one court to another on the basis of mere "apprehension".
The court said it was of the view that Ranaut has failed to make out a positive, concrete case to show that her apprehension is reasonable.
ALSO READ: Kangana Ranaut’s Emergency release date OUT; Check Inside
Comments (3)
Kangana had it coming. She mouths off to anyone without a filter and makes sweeping statements in the media without proof. Just because she can get away with 99% of her crap due to her political connections doesn’t mean that that the 1% isn’t going to come back to bite her.
3 years ago
People just want to harass Kangana because she doesn’t mince her words and calls a spade a spade. They should stop getting offended and develop a thicker skin. She’s not perfect and sometimes overdoes it. Who cares? She’s feisty and fierce and I admire that about her. And she’s a pretty good artist too despite people pulling her down based on their personal political agendas – I feel sorry for them.
3 years ago
Kangana has become enemies with most people in Bollywood. Then cries when nobody appreciates her movies or advocates for her acting
3 years ago