!! Rajat Tokas AT#52 !! get well soon Rajat - Page 27

Originally posted by: munnirony

its ok & i dont have probs with tht. my prob is decreasing imp. of jalal, which is not fair. there should be equality b/w both the leads. the whole story is as if jalal transformed into akbar just bcoz his harem, he has no contribution in it, which is utter rubbish.

shreya i absolutely agree with u! it is utter nonsense! look at the trps! this is what audience want! istri pe zulm aur bande gande😆!

Originally posted by: mandyg

jalal ko abhi akbar jo banana hai tabhi zyaada flawed dikha rahe hain..otherwise audience differentiate nahin kar paayengi😆..but in the history nothing like that is mentioned, akbar became akbar not because of jodha only..but this is a pure fictional show with historic characters bas! aur yehi to rona hai meri jaan ke sach ka naamo nishan nahin hai😭

Originally posted by: munnirony

prob is tht evryone is flawed but in the end jalal is only proved wrong. if jalal is shown strongly whether positive or negative then things will be balanced.

how can we give these suggestions to cvz? hamari maange puri karo! saada haq aithe rakh!

Originally posted by: mandyg

how can we give these suggestions to cvz? hamari maange puri karo! saada haq aithe rakh!

Originally posted by: munnirony

jalal ko itna zyaada bhi flawed nehi dikhaya hain ki sab suli pe chada de. he had showed enough gud qualities which many men, especially 16th century men, lacked.

i know! hamane kissi se kya lena dena..hum to usse khuda maan rahen hain..apna pyaara sa AT hai..hum hain..achchi baaten kar rahe hain aur kya chahye..tu relaxed raha kar yaar

Originally posted by: mandyg

darr ke maare theek ho gayi😆

Originally posted by: munnirony

god knows. agar TRPs aa rahi hain to CVs aisa hi karenge.

ok guys. got to go. gud night.