Meaty roles are for men, not boys: Ajay Devgan - Page 4

Originally posted by: HakunaMatata_94

Hola Sexy🤗

On topic lagta hai budhao satya gaya hain

i guess his unibrow biwi threw her latest collection of M& B on him so he is lost marbles

seriously whats with this husband wife duo on a spree of giving W*F statements🤪

I can safely say he is jealous of Biru.

He needs some rest... Bichara Pagal ho gaya hai!

He may have meant this

^^😆

i think he is right in movies like singham rowdy rathore dabang 👍🏼

Originally posted by: Qureeshi

You forgot Himmatwala

Originally posted by: Qureeshi

You forgot Himmatwala

👍🏼 ya

Ajay's talking out of his ass lately. Crazy eye's seen some success and the ego starts inflating. Thank god for Himmatwala.

I think Barfii and Wake up Sid were meaty, substantial roles fulfilled by a so called boy. Ishaan in Taare Zameen Par was a substantial role, the hero of the movie, and he was a wee lil boy. I think there are some young boys like Arjun Kapoor or Ranveer Singh who can do some manly type roles.

I don't think age is a criteria for good roles. A heroic character can be an eight year old kid or an eighty year old feeble man.

I think Ajay is confusing meaty role with masala role. Only the likes of Akshay Kumar, Salman Khan, Ajay Devgan etc can pull of these Rowdy Rathore, Dabangg and Singham – type roles because their fans enjoy such films, they have been in the industry long enough to take the risks.

The youngsters cannot risk stupid movies, nor can they risk alienating the new youth who want identifiable stories or something unique in their central characters.