Arnav is an anagram of Ravan. An observation could not have been more spot-on.
You know, before the CVs lost their grip on ASR's characterization, this is always what I thought about Arnav. Going by the disaster they are writing now, it is hard to believe that they had actually named this show as 'Vaidehi' at one time with perhaps the exact kind of analogy with Ramayan that you brought out so beautifully in your post.
But to continue with the character arc that ASR once was, I thought he was Ravan through and through. And that is because, to me Ravan was always the hero of Ramayan.
The force of Ravan's existence was such that every part of the story just happened as a reaction to him and his actions. He was all that you said - a scholar, a just ruler...but even more than all this, I think he was an antonym to all those "good girls/boys" who rarely make "history" on their own. I loved the character and I could even identify with his arrogance. In real life, if you have pulled yourself up to that kind of pedestal of "success" all by your own, you are bound to feel a little smug. That is natural and to an extent well-earned. Trying to suppress it, unless it goes beyond ethical realms, is actually dishonest. I liked how honest that character of Ravan was to himself. He knew he had done what he had to do but he also knew what was in his hands NOT to do. He DID NOT touch Sita. If kidnapping her was in line with his value system (sister's revenge), so was not maligning Sita's purity. And he was honest even in his death. He revered Ram for all the later's good qualities (true sign of an educated mind with a lion's heart) and felt no loss of self-esteem when he asked Raam himself to end his life after being defeated by him fair and square on the battlefield.
Raam does not exert his existence much although he is a fountain of personality and talents as well. There is, however, one crucial point that always distinguished Ravan and Raam for me.
Raavan's love and passion for Sita and Raam's love and passion for Sita.
Raam was the man who in the world's eyes was authorized to love Sita. (Like, many of us some times feel, Shyam is after all much more well-behaved around Khushi and he has the mellowness required of a married man...etc...).
Ravan, on the other hand, was her clandestine lover. ( Almost illegitimate like the current 'fake' marriage)
But, when it came to really living these roles, Raam failed miserably ( whatever be the reasons...there can be a whole debate over a ruler's responsibility towards state vis-a-vis his family...and I can go on and on but that is not the question here).
So, Raam let his love sacrifice herself to save his 'greater' skin. While, Ravan went against his 'greater' skin - the demonic world - to hold his passions and desires for Sita back so as not to cause her any further defamation. This despite the fact that Raam left his sister "unmarriagable" for life because he frivolously decided to punish Surpanakha for her overt gestures towards him by cutting off her nose.
I thought ASR's character was through and through Ravan before he started to physically hurt Khushi and before he started to think that his brother was a complete WIMP and had no life or mind of his own. This is where I now see glimpses of Raam in ASR - that Raam who did not think much about Laxman's wife and family life before he 'let' him accompany him to the forest where he himself was going to enjoy 'female companionship' before the 'eyes' of his s*x-starved brother.
And that Raam, who thought sacrificing Sita's fame for the greater good was the noble thing to do.
Sorry, for carrying on for so long but you have started on a very apt topic for discussion. Will be good to know various points of view on this.
Edited by wesha - 14 years ago