Malooom kisi ko kuch nahin, khaali pili mein dimaaga ka dahi kar rahe hain...
🏏 IPL 2026: Match 5, LSG vs DC at Lucknow🏏
🏏 IPL 2026: Match 6 KKR vs SRH at Eden Gardens🏏
Ranbirs shocking transformation
MAIRAs PLAN 1.4
Dhurandhar 2 Shows CANCELLED amid Low Audience
Assembly Elections - 2026 💫
Dhurandhar The Revenge Story Was Stolen
Ramayna has overtaken X
Dhurandhar - Directors Cut
Anupamaa 01 Apr 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
How many books did you read in 2025?
The Pauper & The Dragon ~ ParAj SS ~ Chap 2 on pg 1
See the partiality here, You are saying the same thing I said, and now you are telling me partial to SK.
No Sir/Madam,
I am just saying let us take care of this one in front of us, let us see how the others got acquitted later and also get them behind bars, by some means. But PLEASE let us not let go of this one, I agree why only SK, why not others, but let us treat Law is a Serial operation, not parallelđ
Originally posted by: aashiq2005
Why dont they file a case against HR under HUMAN PROTECTION LAWS? What happened to human rights?
First big fish is in the net, usko pahle adhe hatho lene do, then chote chote chote fish
First big fish is in the net, usko pahle adhe hatho lene do, then chote chote chote fish
Woh bhi hai waise bhi humans endangered species nahin hainđ
respect ji, I think you have 2 different points confused here.
My point had always been why others are not convicted. I have never said "Why not acquit Samlan because the rest of them are acquitted too".
Also, the other point I was trying to say is "If Salman is guilty of killing an animal, then I (including majority of people in this world) am guilty of eating non-veg too every often". Although I agree he killed an endangered species which is against HUMAN MADE LAW. I am not defending anyone here although I did say that he got the bad end of the deal because he's been media favourite for creating sensational news.
Oh Srianneji - rest assured - I was not confused on your position on Salman's being convicted ! I was merely stating a point of view and especially the earlier views espoused by Seemaji in which her constant refrains were "why was Salman alone convicted? Let him go...until you have all of the others rounded up " or words to that effect (not quoting ad verbatim of course) made me speak up and since you seemed to be taking up cudgels on her behalf đ I just expounded a general theory after your observation.
Honestly wasn't an attack on you !!
Originally posted by: Shantibai
agreed
and before that dimagii dahi becomes juicy lassi let me also remind the millenia here that Mansoor ali Khan of Pataudi should also recieve the same treatment as my bud Salmaan
yeahđ
I do not think he will get same treatment, even that everybody know MAKP is breaking this law since long.
I think this is the only topic in the recent past which went this long without members attacking one another.
Thanks to all who supported my point of view and many more thanks to all who did not agree, but still made healthy arguments instead of attacking.
I gotta go now, bye all.
Why would anyone attack anyone when we are celebrating JUSTICE. Agar SRGMP C-2005 mein Nyaya hota, to fir koi fasad hi nahin hona tha..
Lekin kya karein woh zaalim reshamiya jab tak hai, nyay se pare hai SRGMP