Originally posted by: nanditaprc
right girls...shera misunderstanding dharam...and going against him..but why??? only after seeing veer's plight na!....veer's fighting death...wounded badly in prison were he was put on dharam's order....he is the king...the signing authority ...how come you expect a king to blindly believe in what others are saying and let them do their own ...no one..but its happening ...and dharam's ignorant to all that....why even nivriti blamed dharam for the kidnapping...din't she??? now tell me does she not know him...she does but its the circumstances...similarly veer's condition made shera blame dharam....
but as far as sia is concerned what has veer done to her...rather than to save her from a bad marriage...and want her for dharam...yet she is against him...even before the theft too...insulting him...isn't she...why??? only becoz now he is not of royal birth and she is brought up to believe that such people are not worth any good...remember when dharam said that av's decision of killing shramiks was wrong she said it was right...why...becoz they are shramiks... and about giving time count the days she has been in the show ..since the reentry..and shera mended her ways on the 3rd day of meeting them...so time is not the factor ..its presentation of the character
jo hai so hai ussai accept karo...jab ussai acha dikatai thai to hum sab tareef kartai thai...then when they are presenting her with grey shades why should we not discuss that to...
its discussion for hoga to against bhi hoga
shera did not mend her ways, ont he third day of meeting DV........... even when DV were in gurukul, she went to get money from that landlord.n veer stopped her........... she took so many months to change........ she changed, but that was gradual.......... n the main factor behind her ultimate change was, veer's dismissal of her........ when veer said, he doesn't want to do anythign with her, thats when she decided, that she will change completely.
sia never had that situation, cos dharam doesn't give much thought to her tantrums......... he doesn't change her with his anger.even y'day when she said abt nivriti, he got angry but he still replied to her calmly........ nt hen sia never said anything........... even bfore one scene was shown where dharam says "tumhe thoda baldalna hoga"
abt abt sia's inconsiderationt o shramiks, she is brought up in a royal family, she doesn't want to waste time thinking abt them........... if she felt, killing shramiks, will be good for aryavrats, she doesn't have any problem. Even when Av said abt the masiha to dharam n veer, he had said that they had killed the shramik children, but even then it did not create any effect on veer, he had decided to just find out the masiha, n kill him for once n all......... but its when veer came to know abt his truth,t hat he started relating to shramiks, n started fighting for them.
thats what we r also saying, jo hai so hai ussai accept karo............... every one r victims of situations............. thats all, if the actions done by shera, dharam n veer r right acording to the situations,t hen whatever sia did is also right according to the situation