Comparing a child with "Samaan"

https://x.com/Singhalpita/status/1906174870796501247?t=2ys0bH1XffLU6tso6eWZSQ&s=19

What a great lawyer Mrs. Sharma

Surrogacy is exactly like keeping someone's Samaan in your bag

Last time Ruhi did it, Mrs. Sharma's fans went berserk "Bache ko saman kaise bol sakti hai, oh my God, we have seen satan"

But Ruhi had a reason to be deranged, she had lost her child and went through a traumatic experience, what reason does Abhira have to compare a baby with samaan?

Yrkkh makers really think they did something progressive with this scene.

Abhira if you are that progressive why can't you go for adoption even after facing complicated pregnancy, a child death, failure of 3 IVF process.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

https://x.com/Singhalpita/status/1906174870796501247?t=2ys0bH1XffLU6tso6eWZSQ&s=19

What a great lawyer Mrs. Sharma

Surrogacy is exactly like keeping someone's Samaan in your bag

Yah nahi baataya daayan abheera ne ki saaman ke wajah se dusra bag phat bhi sakta hai. aur saaman baahar nikalne ka right bhi chhin jata hai

I was thinking the same. It's normal for Ruhi/Abhira to compare unborn child with saman "burden" and saman "possession" in fiction but then an unborn child (though only a fictional character) is also called doomsday magnet by people in real, or woman (FL) who lost too many lives around her is termed doomsday magnet the way in 15th century woman was termed "manhoos" or "cursed" if her husband/child/family died and she survived. Nothing changed even when people are supposedly educated nowadays.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

I was thinking the same. It's normal for Ruhi/Abhira to compare unborn child with saman "burden" and saman "possession" in fiction but then an unborn child (though only a fictional character) is also called doomsday magnet by people in real, or woman (FL) who lost too many lives around her is termed doomsday magnet the way in 15th century woman was termed "manhoos" or "cursed" if her husband/child/family died and she survived. Nothing changed even when people are supposedly educated nowadays.

See, I would be very blunt in stating that if a woman despite being a woman justifies surrogacy , gives analogy equating a woman as 'bag' and a baby as 'saaman' then she very rightly deserves to be called manhoos. If a person does nasty act then she will be labelled with nasty terms like manhoos, doomsday, witch.

Originally posted by: ThukkadRajaShah

See, I would be very blunt in stating that if a woman despite being a woman justifies surrogacy , gives analogy equating a woman as 'bag' and a baby as 'saaman' then she very rightly deserves to be called manhoos. Despite living in 21st century people are damn insensitive. If a person does nasty act then she will be labelled with nasty terms like manhoos, doomsday, witch.

@bold what's the need to justify surrogacy when both surrogate and biological parents are in mutual agreement? Surrogate herself wanted to carry the child or had a legal agreement to carry the child. There are around 10,000 surrogacy cases in the world each year, do all biological parents have to justify surrogacy? Obviously not.

@red for people woman cursing another woman, wishing bad for unborn child because of his/her grandmother or setting up mandap to get married to her jeth when she is already married, setting up seven day plan, causing dispute between brothers or being exceedingly inconsiderate towards infertile woman isn't "nasty" but not being considerate or mature enough to give mourning mother space is nasty. If the latter one is termed nasty former one is beyond being nasty. Ruhi was a vamp who was praised for being "nasty" just because of personal disliking towards Abhira's parents, wheras Abhira is termed junior doomsday magnet because she is Akshara's daughter again a fictional character.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

I was thinking the same. It's normal for Ruhi/Abhira to compare unborn child with saman "burden" and saman "possession" in fiction but then an unborn child (though only a fictional character) is also called doomsday magnet by people in real, or woman (FL) who lost too many lives around her is termed doomsday magnet the way in 15th century woman was termed "manhoos" or "cursed" if her husband/child/family died and she survived. Nothing changed even when people are supposedly educated nowadays.

I love how you tried to defend the character by saying that real life people are as bad because they are mean towards a fictional characters.

So cute

But the comparison was between two fictional characters, one got hate for saying baby was samaan another is hailed for it, ye hypocrisy kya kehlata hai?

Real life people are allowed to be mean to fictional characters, if your feelings for real people and fictional people are same then......

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

@bold what's the need to justify surrogacy when both surrogate and biological parents are in mutual agreement? Surrogate herself wanted to carry the child or had a legal agreement to carry the child. There are around 10,000 surrogacy cases in the world each year, do all biological parents have to justify surrogacy? Obviously not.

@red for people woman cursing another woman, wishing bad for unborn child because of his/her grandmother or setting up mandap to get married to her jeth when she is already married, setting up seven day plan, causing dispute between brothers or being exceedingly inconsiderate towards infertile woman isn't "nasty" but not being considerate or mature enough to give mourning mother space is nasty. If the latter one is termed nasty former one is beyond being nasty. Ruhi was a vamp who was praised for being "nasty" just because of personal disliking towards Abhinav and Akshara's daughter, again a fictional character. I haven't ever seen a lead of new generation of a fictional show being hated and loathed just because of his/her parents, to extent of justifying that they are facing karma of his/her parents when he/she (ML/FL) is just fictional character written that way, or made to suffer and cry 24/7 so TRP viewers sympathize with her and they did every single time (proven by TRP).

Same rona of people hating Abhira because she is Abhinav's daughter but for how long do you want sympathy for the same thing?

If people can love her for being Abhinav's daughter why can't they hate her for the same?

All leads get hate, Abhimanyu was hated too, is still hated, Anupamaa gets hate everywhere even though she is biggest brand of SP but Abhira fans want people to love her because she is lead

No matter what she does, love her, you do it, why expect others to be a blind worshipper?

Originally posted by: ThukkadRajaShah

See, I would be very blunt in stating that if a woman despite being a woman justifies surrogacy , gives analogy equating a woman as 'bag' and a baby as 'saaman' then she very rightly deserves to be called manhoos. If a person does nasty act then she will be labelled with nasty terms like manhoos, doomsday, witch.

That's the thing

Abhira literally equated her womb with a fata hua bag and Ruhi's womb with a functional bag and baby a samaan

That's how women are? That's how you belittle a process like surrogacy?

In this, her fan's come and say she is hated because she is Abhinav's daughter, hadd hai

Can't even be fair and say that her analogy was wrong, but Abhira ko wrong nahi bol sakte na