GHKPM WRITTEN UPDATES & EPISODE DISCUSSION # 133 - Page 76

Originally posted by: Aadi04

The point is the actor is not doing much to Sai to show her pangs of motherhood

The bond between Savi and Sai is not displayed adequately for us to root for the duo .. inadequacy if the screenplay

In hindsight the vamp Pakhi in season 1 had a much much stronger bond with Vinayak .. she used him for her purpose of tying herself with the man she loved .. giving the facade of happy family

What Savi is doing with Sai is one of the most weakly enacted track of the show .. Sai is very fond of her ..and cares deeply for her .. we are attached to our aunts and neighbours

So long Sai was a teacher it was ok along with her step mom .. its ok .. she settled in an arranged marriage.. many of us do .. all don’t find love in a marriage

But Savi is in a very tricky situation.. the child is impressionable and at some time .. may grow attached to the birth mother.. there would be nothing wrong in that .., savi would be wrong if she keeps her away from Ashika .. just because ashika dumped her ..blood relations are tricky .. its better the individuals better take a call on it

Savi doing nothing as a back up when she showed up so much promise as a kid and in season 2 is wrong

Ishan was not a saint .. but the situation he was married to Savi was also not right .. he was forced to marry Savi .. on the day before he was marrying isha ..by guilt .,

He had feelings for both .. and Reeva was not a bad person .. they never showed her as a bad person

Inspite of the complications.. Ishan tried his level best to train Savi .. for doing Upsc ..

he also gave up his life to save her .. and secured her with a family .. he would not want her to just do nothing in life ..

Forget Savi’s parents they led their lives and lived on their own terms .. they did nothing much for her … but what about this girls own ambitions

I don't think you understood my point at all.

It's not about Ishita, Savi, DT, Bhavika or whoever has ever played any motherly role on screen.

It's about our outlook towards mothers in general. I am a working woman myself, a teacher nonetheless. I feel happy in my achievements and want to go further, make my parents proud. That doesn't get me the license that I'll insult another woman for choosing to stay at home and looking after her child. It's always about choice. Our society has set up this unreasonable criteria that a woman should be able to handle all these responsibilities but NO! we need help too. If someone feels she can handle her family and job - hats off to her! 💙💙💙 But if she wants to spend her entire time to her child, who am I to point finger at her? Or call her an unpaid nanny? That's my issue and I'll always say this to everyone who comes up with a fake definition of modern and smart women.

Coming to the second point, it's perfectly okay if someone doesn't feel connected to Savi's maternal instincts and finds the actor bad. IMHO, YHM did some OTT stuff on a lot of scenes and I like the toned down version here. So what's the big deal? I remember back in our days, people hailed DT and KP as the best actors of India. Sahi bhi hain - we liked them. But if certain people no matter how small they are in number feel Bhavika is doing a great job, why should YHM fans barge into every single discussion just to create a ganda mohol?

Last but not the least, everyone here wants Savi to get back to her original self because Savi and Ishita are two completely different characters.

But... You never know how trauma destroys someone from within. It's practically unreasonable to allege Savi for wasting her parents and Ishan's efforts because she has faced the worst and I have only good words to say about her as she is still trying to do her best, even if it doesn't fulfill other's criteria of being successful.

Savi loves Vansh also. But he is her nephew and beyond that there isn't some additional factor. For whatever reason, she feels connected to Sai. Generalizing it to our love for neighborhood kids is another funny attempt to downplay her emotions.

Long story short, anyone can like anything and it doesn't really matter. However, fake idea of modern thinking and feminism is even more harmful for women than anything else in this world. Savi is a fictional character. But those who are commenting here are very much real and I'm sad that such people exist in the society.

Accusing me of creating a "ganda mohol" just because I expressed my opinion like everyone else did.! Wow just wow

And regarding Savi not doing any job, it's not about homemaker vs working women..It's just ghum makers being lazy. They added additional toxicity by humiliating Savi in her workplace and making her lose her job, but they didn't know how to resolve it and simply brushed it off under the carpet.

There's nothing wrong even if Savi choses to be a homemaker. But did ghum cvs bother to show her POV? She didn't resign from her job to become a homemaker. She was thrown away from her job in the worst way possible over false accusations. She didn't chose the life she is living right now. So ghum cvs are to be blamed for completely erasing her individuality.

Lol not only yhm fans r creating ganda mahol here but neutral fans r also not liking bhavika or hitesh..That maturity which Raman Ishita's character had isn't seen here nor that emotional bond is built here in btw rajat n savi..

Originally posted by: zohakhan7

Lol not only yhm fans r creating ganda mahol here but neutral fans r also not liking bhavika or hitesh..That maturity which Raman Ishita's character had isn't seen here nor that emotional bond is built here in btw rajat n savi..

Originally posted by: Golimumab

Accusing me of creating a "ganda mohol" just because I expressed my opinion like everyone else did.! Wow just wow

And regarding Savi not doing any job, it's not about homemaker vs working women..It's just ghum makers being lazy. They added additional toxicity by humiliating Savi in her workplace and making her lose her job, but they didn't know how to resolve it and simply brushed it off under the carpet.

There's nothing wrong even if Savi choses to be a homemaker. But did ghum cvs bother to show her POV? She didn't resign from her job to become a homemaker. She was thrown away from her job in the worst way possible over false accusations. She didn't chose the life she is living right now. So ghum cvs are to be blamed for completely erasing her individuality.

Savi was fired from her job because of the criminal case being registered against her, even tho it was false, but she went behind the bars. Workplaces usually discontinue tenure of that employee, until the case is resolved.The employers & parents didn't know the truth Agar dushman like Arsh-Aashka sendh lagake peeche lage ho, to leak personal information to defame you & make your life hell, toh it's very much possible, that the news would reach to your boss

This maybe toxic & painful for us viewers to watch. But it's the REALITY, GRUESOME REALITY. It does happen in real life. School & Parents, or even at any workplace in the world won't accept an employee with a criminal record, even if it's a fake case, or he/she is innocent but they don't know the truth , so they can't risk keeping a controversial employee. It's like "Guilty until proven innocent" in the society

The person in question has to acquit themselves from all the charges & win the case & prove that it was a false case, only then they are accepted back in their job. Then, the workplace has absolutely no issues to take them back. I have seen a real life example- when a teacher was put behind bars in the false domestic violence case by his influential in-laws, his job too was gone. Only when he was proven innocent & won the case, that the teacher was hired to his job with full respect.

Whatever it was shown ijn Ghum- was the REALITY of the SOCIETY

And now that Savi too was acquitted from all the charges long back, they should have immediately dealt with her resurrection at her workplace. But they're too careless to do that

So, yes Ghum writers have been absolutely lazy & done a shoddy work in not dealing with Savi's teaching job. It's infuriating Ghum delayed re-establishing Savi's glory dignity at her workplace by proving her innocence & in front of those accusing parents, colleagues & principal

I think, Ghum writers are just postponing resurrection of Savi's career to deal with it later, because closure of court cases do take time. We should have patiently waited & watched.

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Regarding -Savi being fired from his job because of the false criminal case being registered against her & she going to jail. Agar dushman like Arsh-Aashka peeche lage ho to leak information to defame you, toh it's very much possible

This maybe toxic & painful for us viewers to watch. But it's the REALITY, GRUESOME REALITY. Reality of our society was shown. It does happen in real life. School & Parents, or even any workplace in the world won't accept an employee with a criminal record, even if it's a fake case, or he/she is innocent but they don't know the truth , so they can't risk keeping a controversial employee..It's like "Guilty until proven innocent" in the society

The person in question has to acquit themselves from all the charges & win the case & prove that it was a false case, only they are accepted back in their job. Then, the workplace has absolutely no issues to take them back. I have seen a real life example- when a teacher was put behind bars in the false domestic violence case by his influential in-laws, his job was also gone. Only when he was proven innocent & won the case, that the teacher was hired on his job with full respect.

Whatever it was shown was A REALITY of the SOCIETY

And now that Savi too was acquitted from all the charges long back, they should have immediately dealt with her resurrection at her workplace.

So, yes Ghum writers have been absolutely lazy & done a shoddy work in not dealing with Savi's teaching job. It's infuriating Ghum delayed re-establishing Savi's glory dignity at her workplace by proving her innocence in her work place & front of those accusing parents.

I think , Ghum writers are just postponing resurrection of Savi's career to deal with later, because closure of court cases do take time. We should have been patient & waited & watched.

I get your point. What I'm trying to say is being a homemaker was not Savi's choice. Hence the criticism regarding Savi being jobless is very much valid. Unfortunately this valid criticism has been reduced to a debate of homemakers vs working women and anyone who's criticising it is being called fake feminist.

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

As a neutral legacy viewer of Ghum I can vouch for this. I just cannot connect to the leads at all. I find this season too bland and boring hence I had to stop watching.

As a neutral viewer myself, I agree that the writing doesn't make sense a lot of times. But then again, when it makes sense, even then some people have problem with it because they just need to talk bad about this season.

Coming to determined women, yes, they have nerves of steel and always remain focused. I completely agree there. But in this particular case, Savi didn't lose Ishan because he died a natural death. He was brutally murdered right before her eyes. Such viciousness is enough for a person to lose her mind.

And finally, let's just say, a person has lost her job and isn't actively trying to get her job back. That definitely deserves some criticism. But if Sai was Savi's biological daughter, would some people still be calling her an unpaid nanny?

I'd like to believe people here are smart enough to understand the difference between constructive criticism and unnecessary negativity.

When someone has clearly mentioned they called Savi unpaid nanny because they can't connect - that itself proves they'll resort to anything the moment they don't agree with someone. I don't have the WILL to counteract their opinion anymore.

Rest it's a free forum, anyone can write anything and is free to interpret my comments in any way they want.