Originally posted by: Haila_tu
Kangana baja hai kahin door....khann, khann, khann
https://twitter.com/MohdWaseemINC/status/1798770746845696103
Kangana se jyada to kuchh aur hee baj raha hai.
🏏IPL 2026: KKR vs GT, 25th Match, Ahmedabad, 17th April 7:30pm IST🏏
🏏IPL 2026: SRH vs CSK, 27th Match, at Hyderabad 🏏
🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs DC,26th Match, Bengaluru 18 Apr 3:30pm IST🏏
MUJHE MAAF KARDO 17.4
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai ~•~ Episode Discussion Thread #3
Now A Fighter 2 Is Being Made
Is Deepika Or Alia Pregnant Again
MAIRAs CASE 18.4
O Humnava Tum Dena Saath Mera - Welcome & Permissions Thread
🕊️ Asha Bhosle ~ Musical Karaoke Tribute 🎶
Two albums from 2001: which one do you prefer?
Originally posted by: Haila_tu
Kangana baja hai kahin door....khann, khann, khann
https://twitter.com/MohdWaseemINC/status/1798770746845696103
Kangana se jyada to kuchh aur hee baj raha hai.
I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she told them. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for genocide or the process of eradication (I think that was the exact wording she used) against the many.
She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.
Originally posted by: anonymouse1
https://x.com/isaifpatel/status/1798742804283404705
Log yahan lady constable ko Kha_tani bol rahe, but jab Chetan Singh ne 4 logon ko unke religion se hate ke karan maar diya tha, tab Hindutva Terrorist nhi bola? gazab ki hypocrisy hai.
Sudhanshu Adhikari, ek Sikh Police officer ko Kha_tani bola, jabki vo apni duty kar raha tha, that's BJ Party/RSS ppl, jo logon ko unke religion ke base par differentiate karke hatred spread karte hain.
For them everyone is terrorist except them🤣
At least muslims n Sikhs accept terrorism exists in their religion. They don't even accept their religion too has terrorists.
They don't even leave their SC/ST community n call them anti-national if they don't support their RW agenda...
Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24
I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she was told. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for a genocide or the process of eradication (I think was the exact wording she used) against the many.
She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.
Also when she incited violence against West Bengal's Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee by tweeting that Banerjee is an “unleashed monster” and urged the PM to “tame her” using violence.
But but but they are the terrorist minorities. Doesn't matter that it has (when it's somewhere in the middle east) nothing to do with our country (not benefiting from it), neither we are doing the war but must insinuate our unwarranted 2rs to phool sapot just cause we are insecure brainwashed by a certain party which is the first one in democracy can't be questioned.Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24
I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she was told. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for a genocide or the process of eradication (I think was the exact wording she used) against the many.
She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.
So the slap to kangna must be condemned while she openly supports genocide.
other lives humanity ye sab thodi na kuch hai madam ji ke samne
Kangana deserved this slap, that's on Kangana
Coming to CISF lady, it is a scary precedent, someone shot people in a train due to his political ideology that was a police officer, police officer in Manipur turned over women to protesters. Security people are for protection. Sabke paas apni ideology apne reasons apni hate hai, if you are ok with security people slapping someone due to ideological differences then don't cry fascism because this is basis of it, when people who are supposed to protect you, turn against you
“ Mere Chit Chat waapis aayenge! " And look, here we are—Chit Chat Thread is BACK, making a grand re-entry like a Bollywood hero in the second...
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/alia-bhatts-sister-shaheen-bhatt-gets-engaged-to-ishaan-mehra-flaunts-diamond-ring-in-dreamy-pics_233683
https://x.com/i/status/2038173590789730782
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/hema-malini-and-esha-deol-react-as-dharmendra-gets-excluded-from-oscarss-tributes-segment-they-shoul_232818
Taking on instagram, Saira Banu penned a long note that read, "Just a few days ago, when Aamir Khan arrived to see me, accompanied by Gauri, my...
1.2k