In Shaurya Aur Anokhi I felt like because her in-laws were so powerful and rich she couldn't fight for her son's custody. This made her mad and obviously, because he is considered the "heir" of the child, they told her that she can't take their child away otherwise they will file a lawsuit. I also don't understand why she didn't actually try.. maybe her times where not great doing that time.Originally posted by: The_Best
So can someone tell me why was Isha forced to leave her son to these vultures? Doesn’t custody of children go to the mothers in India? How come her brother-in-law and his wife had so much power to keep her son away from her and she had to leave her own house and son?? I am not understanding this, and this has been on my mind since the start of S2.


72