So it took Abhir to ran away - Page 4

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Common she is not that " bad " like people make her out

" humiliation " is difficult to forget esp at the hand of person whom a woman love the most !

Physical harms and pain people will forget , but not the way " some one made a person feel" is difficult to forget !

AbhiM's anger if Abhir inherit which way it is going to help him! Anybperson should learn to accept " No" that is important too!

Uncontrolled anger can destroy relationships s !, married couple , they must take decision without interference from the parents or any one !

Both AbhiM and Akshu failed in it , AbhiN never had a family

I have told the same things few times and not interested explain further , this is what I think , my opinion...

Humiliation is difficult to forget ..very true

But why will Abhir inherit that...Abhimanyu had a reason for his anger since childhood....Abhir doesn't...in any case if Abhir gwts ti become like Abhimanyu '....then Akshara fails like Manjari

AbhiN never had anything...which I mentioned earlier occasions..not interested anymore

Originally posted by: AvantikaP

Can the Sharmas now collect their sharam and leave, run away, or vanish for good or like besharams they are extending their stay at Goenkas.

Don't the Sharmas need to look after their jam making/ home stay and legal business. Never know on the way back Ak mam will want to explore some other career opportunities.

Atleast they didn’t intrude into ex house and self invited stay for months

Originally posted by: Miss-Behave

It was honestly a funny episode, and all the comedy material was provided by kandmaata. I mean she seriously had the nerve to keep saying that if court decided to give them abhir's custody then it must have been for a good reason, despite both her and Abhimanyu knowing fully well the literal only reason they were given abhir's custody was because they are rich, a real rude slap on the face to most of the parents in this world who are poor/middle-class (so by the court's logic most parents in the world should have their kids taken from them in favour of having a child adopted into a rich family then).

Then even after the umpteen time hearing from abhir how he can't live without his parents and that he will continue to run away to be with them, she still chose to be completely dismissive about abhir's happiness and feelings even after everything she has seen and heard. This woman can only function as abhi's mother.... her grandson wouldn't even land on number 10 on her list of priorities because all the other positions on that list are allotted to her son and her own ego/ feelings. She hasn't once actually thought as herself as abhir's grandmother, but only abhi's mother, which is why she keeps brushing off abhir's pain.

Then some criticism is required for anand and manish.

Anand spouting bakwaas about how abhir will get used to living without his mother the more they force abhir to live with birlas 🤪 Yeah sure, Birla's are such caring and good people to raise a child when they say such garbage for their own benefit, regardless of how miserable it makes a child.

I was rolling my eyes non-stop at manish talking about how akshara-abhinav's financial status will improve and him sulking. He really disappointed me because I was hoping at one point at least one character will point out that having an abundance of wealth isn't required to raise a child, yet even manish in his silly dialogues was propagating this silly itv logic that parents need to be wealthy to raise a child. A parent needs to be able to provide a safe environment for a child, provide the child with it's basic needs such as food, shelter education and emotional stability, and that's what most courts also expect from a parent/ parents, which is what Abhir has been getting all these years from akshara-abhinav.

I wasn't surprised at parth suggesting akshara-abhinav wouldn't be able to afford to send abhir abroad for studies, because what an absolute necessity it is in a child's upbring to get overseas education in a swanky school/ university

A lot of stupid things were said in this episode, and for once I had no criticism towards abhimanyu, because at least unlike his family elders who still couldn't give two-shits about the child who is suffering, he did wake up and realise his son's happiness and feelings are above whatever else anybody else thinks or wants.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

everything the characters said was nonsense because the whole scenario shown was unrealistic..firstly..in reality abhimanyu would never have got custody because he’s single and hasn’t been living with abhir. Abhir lives with his mother and step father who love him and they are a happy family so the court would have granted them full custody and abhimanyu would have gotten weekends,. The sharmas are not poverty stricken..they have a house and they both have jobs. You don’t need to have a university degree and a professional job to raise children ..the court knows that.. so Abhimanyu being financially well off would have been asked to pay child support like most divorced dads do.. so that would have Covered some of abhirs expenses and the sharmas would have covered the rest. This show is illogical..they carry on like it’s normal to be super rich but it’s abnormal to be working class when In reality it’s the opposite..majority of families are working class and being super rich is the minority not the majority in this world,..everyone knows that..

Referrence

https://www.vidhikarya.com/legal-blog/fathers-custody-rights-in-india

Father Gets the Custody in The Following Manner

In India, it is believed that no one can be a better caregiver than a mother. Unfortunately, it is not true all the time.

Though while giving the custody the mother is given the first priority, the father can get it by following ways:

If the mother is willing to give up the custody of the child, then the father may get custody.

If the mother is not mentally stable, the father is the next person to get custody of the child.

If the child is of 13 years or more and expresses his wish to stay with the father, the Court shall grant it to the father.

In case the mother is of an immoral character, which may affect the child as well, the father gets the custody.

If the father can prove the financial incapacity of the mother which shall in future affect the upbringing of the child and also prove his financial capability to take good care of the child.

If the father can prove that the background of the mother has been in dark and that if the child will stay with the mother it will prove to be fatal to the upbringing of the child or shall affect his mental and physical growth.

If the mother is a convict herself, the custody of the child shall thereafter go to the father.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

everything the characters said was nonsense because the whole scenario shown was unrealistic..firstly..in reality abhimanyu would never have got custody because he’s single and hasn’t been living with abhir. Abhir lives with his mother and step father who love him and they are a happy family so the court would have granted them full custody and abhimanyu would have gotten weekends,. The sharmas are not poverty stricken..they have a house and they both have jobs. You don’t need to have a university degree and a professional job to raise children ..the court knows that.. so Abhimanyu being financially well off would have been asked to pay child support like most divorced dads do.. so that would have Covered some of abhirs expenses and the sharmas would have covered the rest. This show is illogical..they carry on like it’s normal to be super rich but it’s abnormal to be working class when In reality it’s the opposite..majority of families are working class and being super rich is the minority not the majority in this world,..everyone knows that..

Yeah then every family should be Kardashians, Bill Gates ,Ambanis…..because according to them normal poor or middle class people r not eligible for raising children at all