Originally posted by: lagjagale
If you guys want to rewrite the story then that is on you. Abhi did nothing of the sort. He was overwhelmed with grief over his brother's death, but he never not cared for her. He was under the impression that since he couldn't care for her she would go to the Goenkas and live there. There was nothing left between them in his mind. And yes, he blamed her for Neils death and their babies death, not his babies death. It's always hamare bacche. But whatever dude, there is all kinds of rewriting the narrative happening cause people are picking and choosing what they want from the story to support their beliefs. He may have said some terrible things then, but the situation was also terrible. He may have been a bad husband but none of this is about a woman's autonomy over her own body. It is about stupid decisions that led to tragic consequences.
Ak wasn't as bechari as people like to think about her. She was a fighter and she fought with Abhi tooth and nail about everything. That was there relationship, they were two very different people who loved each other. But apparently that is also a lost concept. Ak would never have taken any sort of abuse or anything really. If she felt even a hint of something like this she would have left a long time ago. But she made a promise to Abhi when deciding for the pregnancy that she fought for, yes, that she would be incredibly careful. As much as I understand a mother's connection to her children even as fetuses, I can also understand a father's love. He loved all of them, Ak and their kids. But the situation got so convoluted and he made some bad decisions and is still facing the consequences.
What does "tumhari vajah se maine apne bhai aur bacchon ko kho diya" imply? Lol
Legally in India, medically, ethically, life starts at birth and ends at death. To say that somehow a woman was wrong to prioritise saving actual children from trafficking because she had foetuses growing in her is callous. Nobody wishes to go through a physically and mentally traumatising miscarriage. Some decisions were taken in the spur of the moment (in order to save the lives of actual children.)
A bad accident caused bad things, that doesn't mean someone has the right to guilt-trip a miscarrying woman who risked her health to carry a pregnancy to term in the first place. I do realise that people are imperfect, and couples do often hold guilt and anger over miscarriages. They often drift apart too. That doesn't mean someone can just throw presigned divorce papers upon a miscarrying woman and kick her out of the house without so much as medical follow-up.
If he had at all cared about her health, he would have prioritised getting her womb cleaned (so that she doesn't die) before deciding to separate lol
Edited by Deltablues - 2 years ago
Cricket
