Firstly, where is Vanku's mindreader? I was waiting for the promo analysis Moor?
I didn't know what to make out of the precap today. Sathya having an after thought on his actions is again not being consistent with his recent behaviour. He has been established as a selfish guy. And with his recent condition it is only natural for him to become bitter and insecure. So this whole part of apologising to Sai for his rude behaviour and then calling V to reunite with Sai looks like a trap. He knows Sai well and V to a large extent. He is playing mind games to guilt trip Sai and play on V's weakness. Both are selfless people and will not forsake others for their own happiness and wellbeing. They have sacrificed their own kids here, why will they not do this for Sathya?
I'm again not sure what to make out of his expressions when he calls V and then when Sai declares that she will not step back from her "farz". It looked like Sathya plotted it. He apologised to get those brownie points with Sai and appear vulnerable to her. And then he could have called V ensuring that Sai hears the whole conversation. Saying the right words that hit both V and Sai right where it should. Sathya would have realised that Sai can't love him. But he knows that she won't shirk away from her responsibilities. So the only way he could ties her to him is using "Farz". And he is content just like P, to have Sai in whatever capacity as long as she is with him.
That is how I could read the sinister look Sathya gave in the end to V. Unless the actor is bad at emoting the right expressions.
Also, watching the promo in continuation aligns with it. It shows that Sai-V are defying Society. If Sathya is willing to let Sai go and Sai is refusing to leave him, why do they have to go away. This can only happen if Sai-V feel that the Farz is compromised and the society and their family will never accept them. Why will Chavans refuse to accept them, accept Sai? Only if Sathya refuses to let go off Sai and she is legally his wife. And why will Sai leave Sathya? Only if she feels that she was being manipulated.
Sai is not wearing a MS. Which means she is not married. Now we discussed this already. Marriage in ghumland, esp for Sai-V is matters of heart. The person they truly believe is their spouse in their heart is the one they are married to. Rituals and societal norms don't play a role here. And this also explains why makers have often ridiculed rituals and customs. Hence, they would want to show Sai-V as rebels, who decide to live life on their own terms, which obviously are not aligning with the rules set by society. So much that they left the kids behind?
There was a spoiler saying that V-Sai's end will remain a suspense. They may keep that open-ended to bring back the characters with different actors, if they feel the need.
Only if HA is a bad actor, and failed to give the right expressions, then could he be on Sai's side? Sai's comment that she learnt to sacrifice love for farz from V, can very well be a taunt and Sathya was trying to make that point to V and make him realise his mistake. Don't think so. But then, anything can happen.
. 