Doesn't Sairat & their kids deserve to be a happy family together? - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

71

Views

4k

Users

21

Likes

172

Frequent Posters

The_aliciaa thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

I'm sorry for judging you too quick but I am sure now that I made the right judgement about you.

Btw, I don't have any issues with anyone opposing my POV but I do have problem with the pseudo-feminist ideas proclaimed by many female viewers.

Anyhow thank you for your wishes and good luck to you too.

I know nothing new for narcissists who live for judging people 🤣


No wonder character despised by all section of viewers got your support.


Contradicting your own words,huh?

Don't bother to reply sweets

The_aliciaa thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#52

DISCLAIMER


Anyone further looking for further discussion which doesn't match thread owner opinion save your time the account owner is here to judge you only 🤣

Aleyamma47 thumbnail
Monsoon Magic MF Contest Participant Thumbnail Love-O-Rama Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: The_aliciaa

I know nothing new for narcissists who live for judging people 🤣


No wonder character despised by all section of viewers got your support.


Contradicting your own words,huh?

Don't bother to reply sweets

I love your double standards in judging sweets

The_aliciaa thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: kuchnaakahoo


There wasn't even a counter reply to what I mentioned about what all Virat did to keep Pakhi in his life and instead I am being blamed for getting bogged down by pseudo feminism.


Virat simply chose Pakhi over Sai. No ifs and buts. But look, the majority of female ITV viewers are the ones at fault. Because we did not keep on our rose tinted glasses I suppose.

Like u mentioned, everything is reduced to gender very conveniently.

Cuz that's how some dimwits know to show their superiority šŸ˜†

Let's make everything gender concerned

janecastle thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 3 years ago
#55

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

Thanks for your judgement.

Well I can see how much you are bothered with anyone supporting the ML.

Not everyone would judge the characters the same way you do.

If you have problem with anyone supporting the character for whom you have so much hatred then you shouldn't bother to reply like a loser.

First look at yourself and then judge others.

So you have to resort to name calling real people for fictional characters. Says so much about your character. Unlike you, I don't give a shit about reel characters. All this is just harmless arguments for me. May be it will do you good to differentiate reel and real.

@bold- How about you understand that first before ranting about pseudo feminism and attacking people personally.

janecastle thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 3 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

Wow now you are proving you are hypocrite too. You say you don't give a shit about reel characters but you were the first person to reply me all because you were so BOTHERED about me supporting the ML.

Again name calling. Great going. Please do get a little more worked up about a fictional character. šŸ‘ It is so fascinating to see the levels people fall to support reel characters.

And I didn't reply to you about supporting ML but for attacking people personally for having a different opinion. Must be so difficult for you to understand since you seem to be so INVOLVED in a fictional character.

Anyway it is a waste of time arguing with you. Have fun with your thread and please don't bother to reply.

Edited by janecastle - 3 years ago
Aleyamma47 thumbnail
Monsoon Magic MF Contest Participant Thumbnail Love-O-Rama Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: 404_found

I agree . This story is different than Anupama . Virat is not Vanraj and Sai is not Anupama .

Virat was shown as a supportive husband who did everything in his hands to support Sai's career after she lost her father . He did go against his family for Sai many times and took stands for her . They showed us Sai fell for Virat for being a supportive partner . Both had their shares of mistake in this journey as no one is perfect . Post surrogacy track Virat let Sai down and he choose P over Sai for whatever reason .

I had shared this before as well post leap narrative as per the makers Virat loved only Sai and didn't intend to move on with anyone and married P only for adoption sake . When Sai comes back he feels betrayed that Sai never came back to him even after going through a big tragedy in life and MU that she moved on . When the MU clears ,he again feels betrayed that his daughter is hidden from him and is conflicted to choose between his current wife who supported him and his ex wife whom he still loves . He thinks his love doesn't want him anymore and decided to stay with his current wife but he is unable to get over Sai . Later he realizes he still loves Sai but is bounded by duty . The only issue why online fans couldnt relate was because it was Pakhi who had a questionable past but for makers Pakhi was positive and had change of heart after her kand in surrogacy .


Going by makers narrative, Virat only loved Sai and Sai is one man woman . The conflict is Virat's farz and Sai unable to trust him enough to have given him a second chance after the accident . They love eachother and their kids are their world . As per them , Virat hasn't betrayed Sai but circumstances made them apart . He wasn't a Vanraj who had an EMA with another woman. Virat needs to redeemed and he needs to realize he made a mistake by not choosing his wife .


In this equation ,if Virat couldn't fall in love with another woman despite her being his first love , perfect for him and his family as shown in the initial leap then how could they show Sai falling for another man when she has always loved him with his flaws . Sai biggest fear was Virat still loves his first love Pakhi but post leap proved he doesn't love Pakhi while Virat biggest fear was Sai doesn't love him enough and can leave him .

I know everything depends on TRP and the scope for dragging but making Sai fall for another man destroys the basic characteristics of Sai . Not all men in her life has to be romantic interest and she got maximum support from audiences post leap because she was shown as someone who single handedly raised her daughter without anyone's support.

I just wanted to ask. Were you the one who had posted your view in my fanfic?

mysticriver thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#58

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

@purple - I agree there are more hints of an upcoming Saiya track rather than Sairat's reunion.

@blue - Well Neil is really good in whatever he does.

And Sairat's consummation track was bold enough to show how professional Neil is.

Clearly, Neil can't deepen the romantic scenes because there are restrictions not just put by his marriage but maybe because by the BARC themselves


Lmao 🤣 sure restrictions put by BARC only for Neil & Ghum thanks for the laughter.


We all if Virakhi were the lead pair the kind of scenes actual romance they'd have shown Neil won't be fake sucking his wife's finger in the show to imply or enact it'll be real lol.

piapriya thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Easter Egg Contest Winner (2023) Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#59

Agreed Virat is not Vanraj and Sai is not Anupama

But just because he didn’t cheat should he be given a clean chit for all his actions for which he hasn’t even apologised truly.

Virat always chose everyone else than Sai when Sai was looking at him for support.

He took away Vinu from Sai and gave it to bhabhiji

He never confronted bhabhiji to keep a distance even when it is clear as day to the whole family she is eyeing him from day 1.

He called bhabhiji the true mother of Vinu and reduced Sai to donor

He took more of a stand when he was in bhaang nasha than he did in full consciousness.

The Shruti kaand, surrogacy kand, the kaand where pakhi literally comes to Virat’s room to ask for clothes so that she can keep his clothes with hers in her bag when Sai was literally in same room, the pheras with pakhi, honeymoon with Pakhi, trying to be a two-timer now with Pakhi and Sai, ordering Sai to not given food pre-leap, etc..

He was abusive in a sense and never took a stand for her. He may claim to love Sai but is not worth it. Sai deserves better.

Who in their right mind would feel good seeing their husband giving other women vaadas and all🤔

And about true life cases, people do compromises but might still live with the trauma and insecurity.

Virat is always wanting Sai when she is not with him and when she was he didn’t appreciate it.

Ragq thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#60

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

Well that's funny all for sake of watching real romance you want the storyline and the character sketch to go crap.

Anyhow that's your take. I understand.

The storyline and character sketch is already crapšŸ˜†

Virat has not been butchered because he was never developed in the first place! Accommodating and prioritizing Pakhi is not new to him, that's how he has always been because the only way he has been written is to keep Pakhi and triangle relevant.


Sai can choose to go back to Virat, if there is growth in his character and there is a redemption arc otherwise going back to him for the sake of kids would do more damage than good.


If Sai chooses to stay single or move on with someone else Vinu will grow up with an understanding it is not okay to treat people as one pleases and it is important to take stand where it really matters. Savi will grow up knowing that it is okay not to settle for anything less.

If Sairat get back together with the only reason being the kids, then they will be subjected to fights because Virat wouldn't have learnt what went wrong in the marriage earlier and the core problem will be the same. Savi and Vinu will grow up with more negative notions and misconceptions about love, marriage and family than they would with a divided family.

Maybe it's common to settle for compromising in order to sustain a marriage for kids but why should it be so?

It's not healthy for kids to grow up in an atmosphere of constant conflict, even if it is a norm in the society to show parents staying together for the sake of children it doesn't have to be right or in the best interest of kids.

Society has been wrong about many things, events recorded in history are a proof of it. So Society does not have to be the ultimate measure of right and wrong, a mark of progressive society is the way it evolves. Women, or even men choosing to get out of toxic marriages and still being able to be a guiding and nurturing force in their children's life would be progress. Holding down a person from moving on for the sake of children because that's the way it is, shows stagnancy and even repressiveness.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".