Sarang forcing his way into the bathroom to bathe with Mukta was not romantic!
Afterwards, when he said, "Tū zabaradastī karāyalā kā lāvalīsa?" he sounded like an abusive partner. "You made me do it. If you had given me what I wanted, I wouldn't have had to take it. Why do you provoke me?"
Shame on Dāra Ughaḍa Baye for sending the message that "No, don't!" is just shyness ... he can make intimacy happen and she will thank him later.
So what if Mukta went swimming with Sarang? Does she have to bathe with him as the next step? Any sexual partner always has the right to take a step back, not forward!
So what if Mukta agreed to wear clothes that left her arms and shoulders bare? She doesn't owe it to Sarang to let him see her naked!
If anyone is viewing this with youngsters, please take a moment to talk to them about consent. When someone says no, assume that s/he means it. It isn't an invitation to be bolder. There is no rule that intimacy has to happen on a honeymoon, or within any time frame. If you've made someone uncomfortable by invading her/his privacy, you should feel sorry, not lay guilt on her/him for not sharing.
Dāra Ughaḍa Baye is marketed as a story that challenges restrictions on what women may do, but here it is perpetuating the TV convention that a heroine must be embarrassed by flirtation. She cannot say yes to intimacy, never mind initiating it!
Wouldn't it have been more romantic if Sarang had said this? "You forgot the towel. Open the door, and don't say anything. Just choose between my two hands. You can take the towel from one hand, or you can take me by the other hand."
Another unromantic observation: the necklace that Sarang gave Mukta misspelled अहो as आहो! Uh! - Oh!