Pootna can never be yashoda.. I hope virat gets killed Friday episode - Page 15

Kyun aaj Sitara ne post nahin dala apni mahan CN bahu keh pravachan ka …. Mein Yashoda hoon … (palatttttt)

I can’t stop laughing…. They should highlight it nah makers neh usko walking in style bhi karwaya with mic drop moment

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣⚔️⚔️⚔️

Aaj starplus ne nahi dala pootna ka promo they know we are waiting.. Kal Vinayak ka bhi continuation dikhayega be ready with your Pootna wale gifs

So the next two episodes can be comfortably missed I guess. Itna long drawn out Yashoda cum pootna sequence, I can't watch. Wailing, crying, half laughing half crying, anger...bas bahut torture ho gaya.

Even I am not sure let’s continue our tirade tomorrow in this thread .. we know what’s going to happen tomorrow..

I do not know anything about your beliefs, but I respect them, and I do not have knowledge for comment ,but the scared should not be compared to ordinary people, especially with character like p. If we want to compare, there are other personalities such as voldemort, dragula ect.

With respect to those characters, of course.[p]

In my religion we respect the sacred in our religion and in the religion of others.

I have researched and understood its importance in your religion. I apologize to you on behalf of the makers of the work.

Originally posted by: NayaNehaD31

I don't know what is the definition of "CRAZY, Madness, Psychotic behaviour, and Criminal Behaviour" for Virat coz he has seen it first hand through Bhavani, Omi, Ninad, Pakhi, Sonali, and other idiots who reside with him. Anyway he has witnessed enough: the last time when police came to arrest Pakhi with proper evidence, still he bailed her out. I don't think he'll do anything against his family, which includes Pakhi. He doesn't consider them criminals, so no punishment for them. More like turning a blind eye. No expectations from him. 🤓

Beautifully said thanks 🙏

Just bcoz there is so much refrence to this mythology, something I want to point out.....

I rem after Vinu's birth, the narrative gave the same analogy and Sai said that even Lord Krishna has two mothers, same way Vinu will have two mothers also, the one who birthed him which was Pakhi and the one who would raise him which was Sai, so as per pre leap narrative Pakhi was Devaki, the birth giver and Sai was Yashoda, the raiser, now they suddenly changed the narrative and Pakhi is Yashoda and Sai is Devaki, but the thing this Yashoda Devaki analogy doesn't feet Vinu at all, coz his story isn't similar to Krishna and makers themselves are confused whether Pakhi is Yashoda or Devaki in Vinu's life........

So what they are missing is, Vinu's story isn't comparable to Lord Krishna but it's actually comparable to Lord Balram, the elder brother of Lord Krishna, I don't know if y'll know this mythology story about his birth or not, but Balram was Devaki and Vasudev's son who was birthed and raised by Rohini, Balram was actually considered a mythological Surrogate child, he was Seventh child of Devaki and Vasudev and when Kansa was in his killing spree of Devaki's children, to protect the seventh child, Lord Vishnu took out the Embryo of Devaki Vasudev's seventh child and put it in the womb of Rohini and then Rohini gave birth to Devaki and Vasudev's seventh child who is called Lord Balram, also he was raised by Rohini in Gokul and then he went away with Lord Krishna to save their parents and then got united with them......

Vinu's story is similar to Lord Balram where the one who birthed and raised him wasn't his real mother........

Here what I want to tell is Surrogacy concept was in our mythology too, Lord Balram was birthed and raised by Rohini but his mother was always Devaki coz he was Devaki's ansh, Rohini is always considered as Balram's Surrogate and foster mother and Devaki his real mother, if our ancient mythologies are so clear that who is real mother then why the makers can't be clear is beyond me and if they want to use mythological references then use the correct one, Vinu's story is not similar to Krishna but Balram......

Ps: Also no way I'm comparing Pakhi with any sacred religious characters just giving an example coz the show provided it as part of the episode discussion, but I've seen many ppl have misconception that just bcoz Sai only gave Ansh and its Pakhi who gave Vinu birth and raised him hence Sai has no right on Vinu, should go through the story of Lord Balram where his real mother is always considered as Devaki by the virtue of being his biological mother even though she didn't give him birth or raised him, so if our ancient mythologies are so clear regarding the concept of Surrogacy then why can't we and makers........🤷🏻‍♀️

Thanks for this. Didn't know about Balram s birth. Learnt something new today.

Will read more about this now.

👏👏👏👏👏

Finally finally….. This aspect has been playing in my head for such a LONG time! It is actually the correct way to put surrogacy. I just never liked the reference of Sai as Yashoda earlier pre leap and neither now.

you said it at the end Devaki is the only mother.

Also with P being illegal surrogate and stealing a child to get closer to Devar, there is no way we can even relate her to Rohini either. Rohini was also very pure and loved Balram, knew her place in their life. So did Yashoda, even though she actually lost her girl child.

THANK YOU!!!!