Originally posted by: Clochette
Strange arguments: The amount of people who "have accepted" the suicide doesn't make the suicide a fact. And why limit the interest for a staged suicide to the Hindi filmindustry?
In addition: Why demean the position of a staff member only because that man isn't a pathologist. He may have acquired experience by looking/handling a loooot of dead bodies throughout his working life.
The only thing that intrigues me is the fact that he goes public only NOW with his declaration...
In my thinking, a soul can't rest in peace if the death was done to hide something sinful...if it is a suicide, the unrest will exist until the soul is given an opportunity to atone in a new life...if it is a murder, the unrest may exist until the culprit(s) have to atone.
Clochette, I understand differing opinions. But this bolded part is not an opinion.
The article said staff boy, not a nurse or a technician even.
I didn't demean the staff boy as a human. I'm questioning his qualifications.
A staff member absolutely cannot do what a trained surgeon can. Experience is critical. But that experience comes after years of study, which the staff member doesn't have and the surgeon does.
The same way a live human wouldn't let an OR tech do even carpal tunnel surgery, let's not disregard the importance of cause of death of a live human and let a staff ever make the diagnosis.
I'd be sued to my last penny if I took my secretary's word for a patient's diagnosis. Yeah, that goes even if she has a PhD in ancient American history and had won the last billion-dollar lottery.
Edited by HearMeRoar - 2 years ago
2