Aur karo apne Sweetudi ko jaldi jaldi maaf…….. - Page 5

Agar CVS anupama se yahe nahi bulwayyebge ki shah house mein nahi jaayegi to apni trp kaise bhada yenge

Good parenting would have been to say no to Anuj, to tell Adhik to find a job on his own (although Anuj giving him a job is fine because at this point I sympathise with him more, he's at least trying to do something and he is qualified), tell them the shelter they're being provided with is temporary and that they need to figure out their own expenses and eventually, move. If they really had to spend money, it could've been to help them in setting up their own flat or to start their lives independently. Pakhi hasn't completed her studies nor does she know anything about household work. If she didn't have such strong support, she would've been forced to get her shit together and this would have done what those innumerable bhashans couldn't do.

so anupama behaving like a doormat, blame it on CVs. But anupama caring for everyone then hail anupama.

waah

Originally posted by: Koms9

and noone can blame this on Anuj. Bapuji forced him to take Pakhi's responsibility. And he is not like Vanraj. He does not force any of his decisions on Anupama even being her current husband, while Vanraj still does that being ex husband and anupama follows them.

If anupama told anuj that she will not allow pakhi in their house, he would have left Pakhi then and there. He does not argue or say no to AnuMA ever. Even the marriage decision he took after AnuMA was doing OTT panic attack. Now she is upset only coz Pakhi wont let her enjoy the wedding in the shah house

@bold why will she ask Anu to do so because in the end she knew no one would have wanted to marry such a brat so its good she got married n in this manner she will live with her only in Kapadia house.

I was also wondering the same. When do we blame the CVs and when can we blame the characters? As far as I know, CVs are to be blamed when it comes to a bad storyline, what they're propagating etc., but a character's negative traits you can blame the character only right?

The line between reality and fiction is getting blurry here 😆

Writer ko story bhadane ke liye anupama aur shah house mein connection to.dikhana hi hai

Saath hi woh yeh bhi chahte ki unki trp bani Rahe to anupama ka education track anupama ko angry mode mein dikha dete hain ..

Why anupama sub ke sub hypocrite Jai kinjal bhi hypocrite Jai she said she will give divorce to toshu but she did not give divorce

But I don't think anupama and kinal are hypocrite Writer are themselves confused what they want to show just to move story they keep changing character personality every week

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Agar CVS anupama se yahe nahi bulwayyebge ki shah house mein nahi jaayegi to apni trp kaise bhada yenge

CVs are showing it definitely which means there is a fault in Anupama's parenting only.Only Vanraj cannot be blamed for raising such shameless kids,AnuMaa will should be blamed too because as a mother if u cannot teach your own child the difference btw right n wrong then it's the failure of a mother.

Teach karne se kya Hota hai anupama lakh teach kare but when her children don't want to listen her teach single word how can anupama teach. Her children

Originally posted by: Koms9

so anupama behaving like a doormat, blame it on CVs. But anupama caring for everyone then hail anupama.

waah

It means that AnuMaa is a hypocrite n a double faced character only 🤪

to agar CVs anupama ko hypocrite dikhayenge to hum anupama ko hypocrite bolenge.