Vankar has killed the golden goose .. in greed of golden eggs - Page 34

Originally posted by: sadiltl

PS: Just make Virat and Sai do Ram Leela so I can sleep in peace that Vankar doesnt meddle with Ram atleast. Too much to hope?

If there is Ram Leela, there is no way Ram is Virat and Patralekha is Sita. Only Sai will be Sita and if this is shown na, there is no way that devar bhabhi are going to be together

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

If there is Ram Leela, there is no way Ram is Virat and Patralekha is Sita. Only Sai will be Sita and if this is shown na, there is no way that devar bhabhi are going to be together

Ram has only one wife! No bigamy either.🤞

And ofcourse Ram is duty bounded at the expense of his wife 😭

Originally posted by: sadiltl

And ofcourse Ram is duty bounded at the expense of his wife 😭

Kuch nahi hoga. Virat will come out looking good at the end of this track whenever it ends. All these episodes will be forgotten by the time we get there

Btw, jaggy is back looks like. Any predictions there?

Virat will jaan se marofy him or what 😭. He has been silent for long. Aise hi mele ki opportunity dekh khe policewala atyachaar na karde uspe

I like duty bound Ram. No issues there but yeah you are right

You guys are too cute. Vankar better buck up for such loyalty

Originally posted by: sadiltl

The problem I have with virat NOW is that he is not providing the closure to himself or the two women. He was hurt rightly so.. I Understand his pain of seeeing the person you love back to life and didn’t call you. His initial outburst and anger is valid. I would do the same. I will be devastated to know that my spouse didn’t call me after she escaped an accident. It feels like your love was a lie. You are nothing to her!!

Now when he has mellowed down, he should slowly clarify his side of story. And try to ask himself why she didn’t return. What could be her reasons. But virat always wallows in his own pain. He considers sai can easily move on from him. If she can leave him then she can forget him too!!! That’s his logic. Now also he assumes she moved on. Not once he thought how his relationship with pakhi reflects on sai. He did have a monologue once but he should stop hurting sai or close himself in front of her. For once, he could have directly asked if savi is their child.
Sais hurt when they first met is this only.. he questioned savi’s birth inturn questioning her love for him. And sai always had this mindblock that virat finds her immature or incompatible with him.
I know they are dragging too! But virat has to clarify his stance to sai before she falls out of love with him. It is easy when he married pakhi. That one act itself is enough for her to resent him.

Now when I think back, they are unnecessarily stretching the plot. Simply not showing how and why pakhi changed, they can’t justify virat’s actions.

Sai at this point had nothing to clarify unless he asks her. Even savi’s truth the time is passed and sai has every reason to protect her child from heartbreak.

The ball is in virat’s court. 😬

So true Sadhika. Closure is something that is much needed. And unfortunately only V can provide that to all of them. Even if it means moving on with P. But this who cycle needs to break.

But V will not do that. He will not let go either and forcefully tangle things for himself and others.

Like you said, he went wrong right from the point where he questioned Savi's paternity. For Sai, V was married and a son. There were was no denials in terms of facts. And with that she had retracted. She completely closed herself with P. And she was right. Now that V was married to someone else, she has no right to question or seek any explanations. And she maintained her stand. She neither asked any questions nor did she provide any. But Sai had no husband/lover in there that V saw. He only saw Savi. Yet he questioned. He was back to Ajinkya track. For Sai, he again questioned her character. And that was enough to stop her from providing any clarifications. The question itself was wrong. It would have been fine, if he had asked, Savi meri beti hai. That would have been like a surprise. But this seemed clearly like an character assassination.

But when he comes to know about Savi will he for once realise his own mistake and feel sorry for doubting Sai? No. For him it will only be his dukh dard Peedha and how Sai kept Savio away from him. No recollection of his own doing, because for him he didn't do anything wrong

Originally posted by: Sherry24

So true Sadhika. Closure is something that is much needed. And unfortunately only V can provide that to all of them. Even if it means moving on with P. But this who cycle needs to break.

But V will not do that. He will not let go either and forcefully tangle things for himself and others.

Like you said, he went wrong right from the point where he questioned Savi's paternity. For Sai, V was married and a son. There were was no denials in terms of facts. And with that she had retracted. She completely closed herself with P. And she was right. Now that V was married to someone else, she has no right to question or seek any explanations. And she maintained her stand. She neither asked any questions nor did she provide any. But Sai had no husband/lover in there that V saw. He only saw Savi. Yet he questioned. He was back to Ajinkya track. For Sai, he again questioned her character. And that was enough to stop her from providing any clarifications. The question itself was wrong. It would have been fine, if he had asked, Savi meri beti hai. That would have been like a surprise. But this seemed clearly like an character assassination.

But when he comes to know about Savi will he for once realise his own mistake and feel sorry for doubting Sai? No. For him it will only be his dukh dard Peedha and how Sai kept Savio away from him. No recollection of his own doing, because for him he didn't do anything wrong

His actions are so atrocious post leap that, we forgot how he called sai bhoj , anath and responsible for samrats death. Never once shown to regret it.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

I dont know i have a strong positive feeling that if Vankar is comparing Virat to Lord Ram, everything will be fine!!! He cant make him Ram and then show bigamy right? Unless in Vankar's world, marriage on paper doesnt count.

So V's Sita is back from 5 years of vanvaas