Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum
the idea is effective communication. With a thick accent like hers, it would be harder for Americans to understand Deepika. Only thing she'd do is invite ridicule if she got on shows in the US. Either lose the accent (making it neutral) or try to adapt.
by the way, you were expressing skepticism about her experiences in the US as a teenager and as to how come she came back. Well, a teen missing her parents or otherwise finding the going tough in American high schools is not strange. Question is what she did as an adult. In her case, she clearly learned to get past it and to become stronger. People also become more confident as they become successful. And a lot of people do evolve and grow up, you know. Just dont get the negativity when she has been a great ambassador for the country.
I didn't question her returning as a teen. I'm questioning her story of what she experienced as a teen because I would not have returned to such a place.
Note that she didn't just do work in Hollywood, which would've been understandable for a person with ambition. She moved to the U.S.
Because of that, I'm skeptical her accent was naturally acquired. I'm also scoffing at the notion racism was the reason she was trying to *fit in,* because other Indians, who are much less genetically blessed, have succeeded with their authentic selves intact.
Agree with you keeping a neutral accent is important for effective communication. But that's not what her fans are arguing. They're arguing racism is the reason she adopted the accent.
The whole picture screams of fakery and trying to play the woke card to get ahead.
FYI. I work in a field where I get to communicate on a daily basis with mid-westerners who come from all walks of life. A small number of them, mostly the working-class peeps, don't understand me. And I do try to speak in a way they can understand. If they don't, they move on to one of my colleagues. But at no point have I blamed them for not getting what I was saying.

6