Next IBF/Star complaint. - Page 2

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

correct pehredaar was shut because child marriage was glorified. Intent of the show matters. Balika Vadhu had a social message and hence it wasn’t. Pehredaar was kinda glorifying the plot. Hence it had to stop. Intent matters.

In Ghum, surrogacy has been illegally done + it has social repercussions. Motherhood is a very sensitive topic and it affects everyone.

Tum boycott character ka strong worded mail bhej doge. Woh mail ke 3 lines bhi nahi read karenge woh log.

tum Matlab log haa. Not tum tum 😆

Who said boycott character ..

I was talking about the whole surrogacy track

Boycott character is silly.. Virat is only fictional

If I write boycott character they won't even read a line..

That was the main post of this topic na 😆 woi toh meine bola. If you write a mail on boycotting character, woh koi nahi padhega. Ulta toh surrogacy pe itna Bawaal ho raha hai woh bhi dilute hoga.

MLcharacter is wrong message about ips/police officer/insulting to the police.

There are many corrupt police officers and politicians abd doctors .. many films are made on that ..

the whole movie pushpa , kgf had so many corrupt folks in responsible positions .. could it be banned ..

they are brushed off as fiction ..

But yes showing the surrogacy track in the wrong way .. is giving wrong message to public .. these are valid issues and needs to be corrected.

Or atleast shown punished in the show .. they can easily show the NGOs entering Chavan niwas ..and hauling Kaku , pakhi , virat for doing surrogacy like this . Even hospitals file complaint .. DIG warns virat of suspension .. so the Chavans cover up the matter by getting pakhi aborted .

Whether Sai gets pregnant or not z they can write a story later .. but these tracks can be erased

Showing a corrupt or negligent officer is different from showing it in a lens where they justify it.

Here V is a guy who should be suspended or fired but gets accolades. Thats the issue.

Tv/cinema can take liberties, can show negative characters but the lens matters. They cant potray wrong as if its right. They did it once in Shruti track too and now they are doing it again.

When they showed a negligent doctor- thurat- he got punished.

Jagtap is treated as a criminal.

Even pp- Sai atleast knows her evil intentions n the way its presented- she is a villain. The lens of the maker is showing her as villain.

But V is treated as some demi god. Its BS.

He is the worst offender. Ips hoke he has allowed one too many crimes to happen.

Many misogynistic and abusive men have been shown but everyone had problem with Kabir Singh because it was glorified. Whereas other times it is simply shown as a display of what exists. Similarly ghkkpm glorifies V as a guy who is sensitive, emotional and righteous when in reality he is NOTHING like it.

He perpetrates and abets abuse, he bends laws, he cant identify right from wrong, lacks basic skills of a police officer.

The problem is not that V is a villain but that a villain is made a hero into this show.

This will still be termed fiction. There won't be action taken against fictional characters. At the most, you will get a reply saying please treat it as fiction.

That kinda geberic BS response is going to happen for the whole surrogacy complaint too. Nothing will happen. Does not mean we just mutely allow them to show any trash.

My contention is that - its not V but the lens in which V has been potrayed thats the problem. If he was shown as a problematic guy who gets due punishment it'd be fine. But here he is glorified despite being unworthy. What has he done in concrete terms to be a hero. Name change?! But in reality he is a guy that allows abuse, watched fraud/manipulation/illegal stuff happen in front of his eyes and did nothing. He is never called out. Infact they eventually get Sai to minimize his crimes like in Shruti track and now where he is tagged as too "bhola" to see pp's reality. Is he SO bhola and blind that he doesn't know the law?! He knew pp isnt geeta and cannot get a procedure done last minute by pretending - but he allowed it. He knew that s childless woman can't be surrogate but he let it happen. He knew that his wife's consent - biological mother consent was needed but he violated it.

Yet all his crimes have been minimized or brushed away as non issues.

Even surrogacy track mein our issue is how its portrayed, not the subject itself.

Similarly with V the character- he should be boycotted because the way he is potrayed is not acceptable.

Him as IPS is s wrong message to people. His character is an insult to police force.

Now in encounter they are going to erase off all the goons and inspector kadam who was the investigating officer for Sai s harassment by the goons i think

..so no proof against P .

Even if they found they may brush it off saying she did for jeene ka maksad.

I am not saying we should not trash the character. We, can fully do so but I am saying complaint against the said character will not hold water as it can be termed fiction. I am not saying it for the sake of it. I have read the whole IBF PDF on guidelines for non-news and current affairs television channels.

Even for surrogacy, they might not change what is happening, but atleast they will change the course of the track. With a character, the said character is always going to be a pendulum between being extreme trash and sane.

Illogical.

If anything V should be even more interested in case because Kadam died over it. These guys are dangerous , they shot dead a police officer so if they let Sai be alive then clearly they had an agenda and it wasnt a coincidence.

And eventually those goons are the ones who can be eyewitness for pp's crimes. She hired them. She met them in geetas neighborhood. And geeta eventually can also be requestioned to verify that pp did come to mislead her.

But will we get any of that?!

It makes no sense to show action scene and kadam dying only for them to forget about it.