Are costumes of Naagins impact TRP? - Page 4

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

for me it looks more like they want to run a show like this without any story 😆 if they have a very good story people will hardly notice their cloths as they have something else to focus on. Yaha par story hi missing hai people will start noticing this more and get irritated 😆 even if we are watching with the family if they see a great story with great potential even they might ignore their cloths. But when there is no good story and if they see their kids watching something like this the obvious question would be "WHY?????Do you want to watch this stupid show?" They might have serious concern over how their kids will grow up as they are not so exposed to these things

I am not so hooked to n6. I watch it if i have time but other seasons initial episodes i was waiting for episodes to air. As there was some thrill excitement about next tracks to know what will happen next. Here i dont have that excitement 😆

Yeah you've a great point. Even I'm not watching this season, I stopped Season 5 onwards. However, till Season 4 I was hooked to the show, each and every episode. Now I don't have that interest anymore.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

It's not just about skin show. In a series where actors have always looked sizzling hot without showing any cleavage, the current costumes look cheap and attention-seeking. You can look sensual without crossing the limits of decency. I'm not saying showing cleavage is always indecent, but it looks desperate for attention in a show like this. It's like they're saying, "HEY HEY HEYY I'M SHOWING CLEAVAGE OMG LOOK HERE YOUUUU". 😆

Hope you get what I'm saying.

Well, no. Not at all. Wearing revealing clothes or showing cleavage is in no way an invitation to ogle as you so crudely put.

And if someone still thinks like that then it's their small mind, their narrow thinking and their problem that they still refuse to move on from middle ages.

Originally posted by: mish_18

Well, no. Not at all. Wearing revealing clothes or showing cleavage is in no way an invitation to ogle as you so crudely put.

And if someone still thinks like that then it's their small mind, their narrow thinking and their problem that they still refuse to move on from middle ages.

I did not mean ogling. I meant wannabe and attention-seeking. Like, gimmicky. As in, 'HEYYYY OMG I'M SHOWING CLEAVAGE I'M SOOOOO TRYING SOOO HARD TO LOOK SEXYYY' type. It looks like they are trying too hard.

The previous Naagins looked effortlessly sexy. They looked hot even without showing cleavage. This one looks like they're trying too hard to show skin.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

I did not mean ogling. I meant wannabe and attention-seeking. Like, gimmicky. As in, 'HEYYYY OMG I'M SHOWING CLEAVAGE I'M SOOOOO TRYING SOOO HARD TO LOOK SEXYYY' type. It looks like they are trying too hard.

The previous Naagins looked effortlessly sexy. They looked hot even without showing cleavage. This one looks like they're trying too hard to show skin.

When you use phrases like "HEY LOOK HERE" and "seeking attention", and I use words like "invitation to ogle", they are both one and the same thing IMO. But if you disagree about the meaning of words then that's fine, your call.

Also when you use words like "crossing the limits of decency" for someone’s costume, it's such a vague & ambiguous notion that the meaning of what is ‘decency’ is different for each individual. For some people it might be cleavage, for some it might be skirt-slit, and for others it might be something even more minuscule.

I’ve already given multiple examples of how mythological creatures (in Hindu folklore, Greek mythology & English local legends) have famously less regard for any sort of skin-show. Hence, my only concern is the comfort of the actor. But if you disagree that's fine. To each their own, I guess. We can just agree to disagree here. :)

Originally posted by: mish_18

When you use phrases like "HEY LOOK HERE" and "seeking attention", and I use words like "invitation to ogle", they are both one and the same thing IMO. But if you disagree about the meaning of words then that's fine, your call.

Also when you use words like "crossing the limits of decency" for someone’s costume, it's such a vague & ambiguous notion that the meaning of what is ‘decency’ is different for each individual. For some people it might be cleavage, for some it might be skirt-slit, and for others it might be something even more minuscule.

I’ve already given multiple examples of how mythological creatures (in Hindu folklore, Greek mythology & English local legends) have famously less regard for any sort of skin-show. Hence, my only concern is the comfort of the actor. But if you disagree that's fine. To each their own, I guess. We can just agree to disagree here. :)

Here its not the actresses who are wearing it of their own accord, it's the production house trying to grab eyeballs with this tactic. So yes, it looks cheap and attention-seeking.

The previous Naagins looked sexy even without cleavage, so this time they're unnecessarily going the extra mile, trying to lure audiences with the skin show. That's inappropriate and gross in my opinion. :)

And no, I'm not shaming anyone for showing cleavage, I myself wear such stuff to parties at times. But here it's looking bad because it looks like they're trying to use the actress' physical appeal in a very cheap way, which is lowering the dignity of the show. Naagin has always been about mixing sex appeal with a fierce personality and a strong story, here it looks like they're making the actresses parade in skimpy clothes to attract audience. It's not looking tasteful.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Here its not the actresses who are wearing it of their own accord, it's the production house trying to grab eyeballs with this tactic. So yes, it looks cheap and attention-seeking.

The previous Naagins looked sexy even without cleavage, so this time they're unnecessarily going the extra mile, trying to lure audiences with the skin show. That's inappropriate and gross in my opinion. :)

And no, I'm not shaming anyone for showing cleavage, I myself wear such stuff to parties at times. But here it's looking bad because it looks like they're trying to use the actress' physical appeal in a very cheap way, which is lowering the dignity of the show. Naagin has always been about mixing sex appeal with a fierce personality and a strong story, here it looks like they're making the actresses parade in skimpy clothes to attract audience. It's not looking tasteful.

Re: Actresses wearing it of their own accord - I think that’s exactly what I have been saying all along. That the priority and concern should be the actor wearing such costumes, because it’s them who have to run in jungles and perform tandav in them. If they’re comfortably carrying it, then who are we to object. Also if they wish to make changes, they are already doing that - like Teja has made adjustments in her look as per her comfort.

Re: About lowering the so-called ‘dignity’ of an EK show because there’s cleavage - Lol ok that’s a load of BS that I don’t even want to dignify with a response.

Okay, Imma stop replying now lol. You don’t like the costumes and I don’t care about them. I’d rather want them to focus on the story-line more. We disagree and it was a healthy discussion. Again, to each their own. :)

Originally posted by: mish_18

Re: Actresses wearing it of their own accord - I think that’s exactly what I have been saying all along. That the priority and concern should be the actor wearing such costumes, because it’s them who have to run in jungles and perform tandav in them. If they’re comfortably carrying it, then who are we to object. Also if they wish to make changes, they are already doing that - like Teja has made adjustments in her look as per her comfort.

Re: About lowering the so-called ‘dignity’ of an EK show because there’s cleavage - Lol ok that’s a load of BS that I don’t even want to dignify with a response.

Okay, Imma stop replying now lol. You don’t like the costumes and I don’t care about them. I’d rather want them to focus on the story-line more. We disagree and it was a healthy discussion. Again, to each their own. :)

It's not a very healthy discussion if you're calling someone's opinions as 'BS'. Also you insinuated that i was saying that revealing clothes are worn for ogling, which I clearly did not say. Also, actresses don't always get the final say in their costumes.

Anyways, yeah, each to their own. Good day to you.

Originally posted by: pranurosid

May be EK said it's mandatory

Mandatory for what exactly?

Originally posted by: mish_18

Well, no. Not at all. Wearing revealing clothes or showing cleavage is in no way an invitation to ogle as you so crudely put.

And if someone still thinks like that then it's their small mind, their narrow thinking and their problem that they still refuse to move on from middle ages.

Do you think wearing such type of revealing clothes while visiting a temple is okay??? In a place of worship, one is expected to dress and behave modestly irrespective of whether it is a man or a woman. And here she was literally doing a tandav in that vulgar-looking attire.

My end of this conversation is over. Everyone’s free to think what they wish to, as am I. Have already made my points before and don’t wish to add on to this now.

Thanks, peace out.