Originally posted by: 404_NotFound
As per Indian law , daughter’s have equal rights . Parents are not obligated to transfer their properties to their kids . They can claim rights only if the property is ancestral one else parents have rights to handover to anyone they like and kids won’t have a say . This is about the law and I am sure makers aren’t thinking so far
I agree it’s better Virat get it fixed . I didn’t like that he let it remain like that but knowing him he might not want Sahas’s future to be effected because of his association with a criminal father like Sada . I hope they find a better way . If Sairat are back as a couple , Virat should talk to Sai about this and seek her permission before giving his name .
Oh good to know. Usually siblings fight for property rights. :) but legally tomorrow sahas can claim the property rights. Because legally there is no difference between biological son or adopted son!! I think. Also ninads property (grandfathers) is legally consumable by grandson, even virat cannot have say this I think.
another thing is after parents demise, kids will get the property by default.
not talking specific to this show where we should not think about legalities but in general also I was wondering if sahas could claim the property because he can always submit birth certificate but the parents are not married!! He comes under ‘illegitimate’. So it will be a complicated court mess 😅
Another problem is sai’s earned money in the marriage is tied to virat unless they had a prenup which I don’t think is valid in india. So basically virat’s kids are in soup and at mercy of sahas.
it is a very wrong decision. But going by virat’s state now, kids is an impossible dream for him… so he is bound to make this stupid decision 😅
Edited by sadiltl - 4 years ago