Virat is more flawed than Sai - Page 2

Another word used frequently is grey... Should specify the type... Dark gray, slate gray, silver gray, light gray... Which gray???

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Neil might agree or disagree with what is being shown in the show but he has been given a brief what his character when he signed the contract. Why would he use the word 'abuse'? We all don't want Sai to go to Chavan Nivas. If she is interviewed, she will may not justify because that's the narrative - whether Ayesha agrees or not.

Interview wise, I thought it was a boring interview. He has not said anything new but the headline is good. It evoked reactions - good or bad. That's a good job in itself.

I think in situations like this, best way out is to put it on the writers and talk about doing the job..He has done that before also, when Virat did not face this kind of backlash..

Bringing in words like dignity, flawed, grey 👎🏼👎🏼 He has done it too many times for Pakhi the character. Again there.👎🏼👎🏼

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Neil might agree or disagree with what is being shown in the show but he has been given a brief what his character when he signed the contract. Why would he use the word 'abuse'? We all don't want Sai to go to Chavan Nivas. If she is interviewed, she will may not justify because that's the narrative - whether Ayesha agrees or not.

Interview wise, I thought it was a boring interview. He has not said anything new but the headline is good. It evoked reactions - good or bad. That's a good job in itself.

That's what. The actors might like or dislike, agree or disagree their characters actions. But if they're asked to do some interview as a damage control, they abide by their orders. Considering the actors and characters as one and their actions synonymous, just for playing the roles is not fair😆

Now that they're showing Virat turning a new leaf, they obviously would wanna do some promotions about the upcoming changes in some form or other, hoping to grab more attention, which is where Trps come from, after all.

I don't think this was a damage control interview. Otherwise, the answers would have been more sharp. This was just a catch-up since the show completed one year.

Neil uses flaw in interview. Just as Patralekha uses beizzati. It has ceased to have any meaning. While pushing the blame on writing, this...

Quoting Neil,

In the hindsight, when you think about how I would like to change so and so aspect about a certain role, it is easier said than done. The way they are, they way they have been devised, I don't think I am in any position to say anything that okay, if we do it like this, it would be better. I don't think I could say that I want to change this, or change, because if we change things, we don't have the same people that the audiences have connected to.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Neil uses flaw in interview. Just as Patralekha uses beizzati. It has ceased to have any meaning. While pushing the blame on writing, this...

Quoting Neil,

In the hindsight, when you think about how I would like to change so and so aspect about a certain role, it is easier said than done. The way they are, they way they have been devised, I don't think I am in any position to say anything that okay, if we do it like this, it would be better. I don't think I could say that I want to change this, or change, because if we change things, we don't have the same people that the audiences have connected to.

I did read that part. But I would still stick to not agreeing to the fact that he can call all this a flaw. Virat being abusive cannot be reduced to it being his mere flaw..Its more than that..Virat has anger management issues and he harms his wife in the process. Similarly Patralekha is vile and cannot be called a flawed human being. Normal people in day to day life are flawed and not these two.

Regarding change, they certainly changed major aspects of the character Virat and that is why people, majority of us are not connected to him. So again there he goes a tad bit wrong. They have already changed a lot in the character Virat, just for he sake of copying and getting TRPs. Had TRps not gone down they would still ride high on "who the hell they are".

A lot of young girls follow these actors and believe in their words.They should not let such things pass and use words like dignity and flawed so loosely. A tad bit of responsibility is expected. I had called out Ayesha as well when she said Pakhi is just in love, long back..

He’s saying, all human beings are flawed, hence Virat is flawed. And following this line of argument, Jagtap is flawed too. So are all criminals.

I can just conclude on one thing. Looking at the way the word flawed is used for the characters of Virat and Pakhi, flawed word ki beizzati hui hai🤣🤣I understand that actors can't trash the characters they're playing onscreen but smarter words can be used by passing the onus of writing on the creative team😆Ab yeh "flawed, flawed, flawed" sunn ke kaan pakk gaye hain🤪

Virat = flawed

COVID = a nuisance

Koi thesaurus gift karo bhai ko 😊