Barrister Babu Episode Discussion Thread - Page 37

Originally posted by: shirin04

wohi i am saying that the provocation/self defence of tapur(yes arc can murder cc in self defence to protect tapur according to law ) but since they had left that place and were on the open street arc cannot murder him. Then the question would be like you should have called the police.

Bon does not know about cc being alive but I did not see her actually examining the dead body or talking to a doc , thinking about how the gun came etc etc. These questions are more important because circumstantial evidence is more relevant than assumption evidence.

I think bondita has more things with her. Which will also be used other than this tapur matter

Originally posted by: Anu234

Bondita will definitely manipulate the whole matter in such a way ani will be proved innocent to some point. Then she will need more proof. That's when she will know about cc and get him to the court. Before that ani punishment will definitely get lessened

I'm not sure she can manipulate it without proof. Bondita, from the way I have seen her so far, she is not the kinda that can manipulate situations. She usually goes on her hunch and does things then gets the proof but court me aise nahi kar sakti wo alag baat.

Pata nahi dekhte hain monday kya karegi Bondu... I'm quite curious how she is gonna present Tapur.

So the judge will tell Bon that this cannot fully justify his action so according to the promo on 6th October Bon will catch CC and bring him to the court. (Makers itna logic lagate hai utna pata nahi par chalo ham logically soch lete hai) Did Tupur saw Bondita when she was holding a small mirror? Tabhi shayad natak ki hogi isne, bahut chalak hai ye par phir bhi khudke liye gaddha khod rahi hai 😵 Ye CC ko pakka bachane ki koshish kar rahi hai 😡

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Yup! That's the first question they will put up against him - Police ko kyun nahi bhulaya, kisi aur ko kyun nahi bhulaya, etc etc. And he is Barrister, at that, so it sounds more silly that he didn't think of all these things before acting.

Arre arre.... Baat ki na doctor se 😆 Dr.Somnath Bhai MBBS 🤣

True though, the actual line of investigation should have gone there but I guess the show makers did not want to go all CID:Tulsipur on us 😆 Court dikha rahe hai wohi badi baat hai.. itna zyaada investigation nahi ho payega.

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Yup! That's the first question they will put up against him - Police ko kyun nahi bhulaya, kisi aur ko kyun nahi bhulaya, etc etc. And he is Barrister, at that, so it sounds more silly that he didn't think of all these things before acting.

Arre arre.... Baat ki na doctor se 😆 Dr.Somnath Bhai MBBS 🤣

True though, the actual line of investigation should have gone there but I guess the show makers did not want to go all CID:Tulsipur on us 😆 Court dikha rahe hai wohi badi baat hai.. itna zyaada investigation nahi ho payega.

Uska answer bhi toh hai, that CC was absconding, and when you see a criminal escaping after committing a crime, you tend to catch him before anything else. Basically, she is probably trying to prove that Ani was intending to catch CC, not kill him.

Originally posted by: Ashley_m

That is exactly what I am expecting actually, that Bon proves provocation and she proves accident as well... Because that gun was accidently fired, and that has eyewitnesses. She is clearly doing something more than just Tapur if all her work is to be believed. Also, in British India especially, the laws were actually quite a mess, mainly because they had to balance the laws with religious implementations.

Mujhe dekhna hai yeh monday ko... I hope this is how she tackles the case too. She needs to manipulate the narrative in such a way that all the proof can fit into it too.

I am not sure if she will be able to manipulate it but I have been proven wrong quite a bit since the beginning of this track 😆 I'll be glad to be proven wrong again.

Originally posted by: shirin04

lol hmsab ko pta hai ki arc will be proved innocent in the most dramatic way possible🤣

Behen... main bol ri hu wo ghasit ke leke ayegi CC ko to court 😆 It's dramatic as hell but I'll enjoy it 😈

Originally posted by: Ashley_m

Uska answer bhi toh hai, that CC was absconding, and when you see a criminal escaping after committing a crime, you tend to catch him before anything else. Basically, she is probably trying to prove that Ani was intending to catch CC, not kill him.

I know, I understand he was absconding but it just gives more strength to the intent to kill theory because rather than calling the guards or someone to help him chase him, ARC left by himself to catch him.

I'm giving the rebuttal for Bondita's explanation. 😆

BB ka pata nahi, par apna mast court room debate chal sakta hai idhar 😎 😆

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Behen... main bol ri hu wo ghasit ke leke ayegi CC ko to court 😆 It's dramatic as hell but I'll enjoy it 😈

Goli toh chali thi, toh bach kaise gya woh itna pass ka goli se