I am just confused...just saw one clip..Why did Virat do a facepalm when Sai spoke about Pakhi hating her from the first day and her being a thorn in her life...Did Pakhi not say that, Sai is the "shani" sitting in her life? So how does a face palm that denotes Sai is talking hogwash fits in here...
Who is adding these reactions ..the actor or the director... In this case both are wrong and are not able to understand the script at all...I mean how can that reaction fit here at all, considering its Sai is talking about her instinct , while Virat knows its the truth.... Director is letting go PL give any reactions for a long time, so I understand there, but actor has been praised for raising above the script.. I am not sure what has happened here...If Virat thinks Sai is talking nonsense then surely he is again a fool to ignore things like such...And if Actor thinks this is the right reactions...well then he needs to remember the scenes he has done on the same context...Itna disjoint is not working great for the character Virat...
Its established director of this show is completely bakwaas..Too many scenes can come as an example..The actor has an experience of 14 years...he would surely know considering the script that this reaction does not fit here at all... because Virat knows what Pakhi said, what she wants and what she thinks about Sai clearly... Sai feels it and is not told by Pakhi unlike Virat...How can he give such a reaction...it has been happening for a while now and I kept thinking it could be editing issue...But itna jyada that his every reaction to the truth Sai speaks is "What bakwaas is she talking" and today he goes on to do a facepalm, knowing very well Virat has heard it all clearly... I mean I always spoke about how they know their characters well, except one...I am fine them defending the characters, but what's with giving these reactions in the scene?