Paapi started the tamasha by going up to her room and crying instead of being an adult and sucking it up for the sake of the family. She is a family member, so she should partake in the family function instead of doing these antics. Sai wanted her to feel included, and hence went to call her. Despite knowing that Paapi hates her, Sai always extends a hand towards her. She even thanked her in her college fest speech with the rest of the family. It is in Sai's nature to include and love everyone. TriMurthi is always telling Sai she has to do things for the sake of the family, and they live in a joint family, always saying that everyone must do things for each other, think about the family, etc. etc. So then why does Paapi not have to abide by those same rules? A part of Sai's actions can be attributed to her stubbornness, but her intentions are pure. I am not one to defend Sai regardless of her actions, so I am not trying to come across as someone who cannot see her faults. It's just that in this moment, I don't think she did anything wrong.
My topic isn’t about what pakhi should do and i am not saying pakhi doing right thing by not attending.. Joint family rules aren’t always right and not necessary to follow by everybody.. No matter who it is..so if pakhi isn’t following family rules doesn’t mean sai needs to force her to follow.. If rules are forced by chavans we bash them don't we?? Sai herself when doesn’t follow their rules we praise her that she has guts but when she force someone to do something on the name of family then she is right? She isn’t wrong in her intention i agree with that totally but she is definitely wrong in her action to force someone who said no to her..