Originally posted by: sweet_tania
Vanraj’s words about rokna/tokna by anupama was not wrong for me. He and kavya’s mother in law Leela is there to correct kavya.
Anupama ‘s answer was logicless , weak and irrelevant about this is her house too and the way kinjal learnt , Kavya ko bhi ghar ke hisab se rehna padega. This words normally come from mother in law’s mouth that meri bahu ko mere system vise ghar mai rehna padega.
Anupama has her name on house property share doesn’t give her position of Kavya’s sasuma, same way kavya is vanraj’s wife doesn’t give Kavya position of kinjal’s sasuma.
So forcefully na he kavya ko kinjal ki sasuma banna chahiye or na he anupama ko kavya ki sasuma banna chahiye.
Taunts are fine by anupama to kavya and vice versa but anupama is not kavya’s mother in law and she should not try to become it .
Joint family mai ek ghar 3-4 logo ke naam par ho sakta hai but that’s doesn’t give license to every member to do rokna tokna on each other.
Writer had written useless senseless response for anupama which was without head, tail and was should be from leela’s mouth , not from anupama’s mouth being kavya’s sasuma.
Baat kitni bhi sahi ho lekin galat mooh se nikle toh galat bann jati hai and anupama was galat mooh looking at her relationship with Kavya who is not her own bahu and baa is expert and enough capable to show kavya about ghar ke tor-tarike.
What was that baa bapuji sharminda ho gaye!!! Sirf bapuji sharminda ho gaye but baa looks quite bold and can boldly say to Kavya the same thing anupama said.
It seems like anupama sirf beti nahi bani hai, baa-bapuji ki zabaan bhi banna chati hai that woh kyun bole, I am beti so I will speak on behalf of them.