Originally posted by: xxMATSxx
I agree with you but again i read that entire scene differently. Pallavis point was raghav came and said whatevrr and because shes a girl, he can come in and say whatever about her character and society wont think twice in believing it. Yes it happens to men also not denying that, but i think t was mainly her rationalizing it because she doesnt want to believe her pyara baba doesnt trust her. Pallavis arguement was technically invalid for the situation but its not a totally invalid arguement overall so any chance to make a point to an audience that still exists in blaming women .. theres nothing wrong in it either. Idk.i somewhere felt writers were using it as a teaching moment.
It was a teaching moment indeed, regardless of how the audience interprets it. For some it will be about women being wronged, for others they will see that Pallavi is using it to justify her father's behavior because it's less painful than accepting the bitter truth of his hypocrisy.
Also, the main point here is that you are the only one who is responsible for your honor and dignity. Don't let others measure it, judge it, or hold you accountable for it. It's none of their business. She's given the Deshmukhs way more emotional power over her than she should have and as a result most of them didn't care to fight for her dignity, forget as a bahu, not even as a woman. It's all good, because at least she's starting to ask questions and thinking about it more, very much needed for her character growth.
Edited by inlieu - 4 years ago