Originally posted by: J3601
if your feeling get hurt over history then you're pretty weak you werent even there... Envaders didnt come to your country because your country didnt exist... there were small kingdoms everywhere, if you were Marathan you had nothing in common with sikhs, afghans or Rajputs... there wasnt a thing called India...
its not glorification its history and invade and concur was part of the history, no body was bitching about it... again there was no India so rajput princess were getting married because they wanted to side with the Mughals, they had a choice and they were smart people so they were siding with the winning side... everyone was barbarians, do you think Marathas or rajputs were kissing people on the cheeks.. go read abit of History..
the funny things is when Marathas were dominant hindus of other kindoms hated them becasue they were double taxing them, and if they didnt pay their tax they were getting massacred.. thats why they didnt side with Marathas in Panipat and sided with Abdali... but i dont see you bitching about them but glorifying them to the death.
Yeah if I feel sad about my ancestors I am weak. Thank u for the enlightenment.
India existed way before any of the barbarians entered the land. The borders were different but the country very much existed. Ancient scriptures mention a "Hind" land, the Sumerians and Akkadians used to trade with the IVC. So the country very much existed, just not in its current way. Go read about Proto-Indio-European/Indo-Iranian documents.
Why don't u go beyond the Sikhs, Rajputs, Marathas etc, way before they existed the way they do now. There are enough details which show from where each clan came into existence, the names evolved and changed from Proto-Indo to what we know it as today.
India was not called India, but it was very much on the map. Had there been any official records from ancient pagan civilisations we would know more.
U think I don't know about the taxing system, how Rajputs also chose wrong? I do and would love to see this shown in the correct way. Not in ways in which some Mongol, Turk conquerer is shown to be some great king India had.
I think I have made myself very clear, I don't want to see anyone glorified, but I want the truth to be shown. There are a bunch of shows/documentaries I have seen on the Ottomans, the siege of Constantinople etc and have always noticed how one side was glorified. And that's not what I want to see. To top it all off pissing off a community in order to glorify some barbaric king...nope not interested.
Indian History has been twisted and shown in the worst ways where we were expected to worship how great some invader was and what structures they built etc...but due to the internet its visible how many were connected structures, originally built for something else. It only gets controversial from here and you know it.
16