Was it within the first year of kundali when either of them was appearing on other channels? It is surprising if like most other channels zeetv has not given exclusivity clause in their actor's contracts, unless after the very first contract of theirs with channel for kundali ended the clauses were changed in contract renewal via actor negotiating? But I am doubtful that from the get go when kundali started either of the leads were given permission to appear on any other channel. It can be that the longer the show ran and the more famous both leads and the channel becomes more lenient with the actors and the actors are able to have more leverage to argue for and against clauses? I'm not sure with zeetv now, but from what I can see the projects that they have been in on other channels whilst on kundali was within same production house. So it is odd then how zeetv actors manage to appear on other channels, and zeetv complains and gets miffed at actors but does nothing about it like star plus does 🤣 I know for a fact zee was miffed with ekta over rajat paridhi appearing on rival channel in a reality show produced by her.
yes they might have relaxed the clauses of contract of both leads after two years thats why they worked with other channels. so the problem is between zee and dd is not due to naagin. they let shraddha participate in nach and they let dd do a cameo in naagin. thats what i am trying to say, it didnt start with naagin. they stopped tagging him when he refused to promote their app.
rajat paridhi might have broken exclusivity clause thats why zee was miffed. shraddha and dd didnt have that clause in their contract after 2 years of the show.
61