Originally posted by: Sashay01
Give me a break. Dont get into the kitchen if you cant handle the fire that YOU (KR ie, not you) started. Who is Kangana to cry about personal attacks and bullying? Leave aside all her stuff with Hrithik and Javed Akhtar etc because fine, she says she was personally involved. In THIS particular case, what gave her the right to raise muck about a dead man's personal life "Oh he left Ankita to date models" "Oh he left all his gfs" "I heard that Sara and SSR were even sharing the same hotel room"- For f*ck's sake, was this the same woman crying and bleating about blind items?
Do you think Ankita and Sara enjoyed reading about this? What does this have to do with the case? Do you think his family enjoyed reading about all those he dumped and who dumped him, allegedly? The silence from the family and Ankita on Kangana's statement has been illuminating about what they think of her imposing herself into the conversation.
A differing viewpoint is not just to be tolerated but also celebrated. But when someone's viewpoint becomes only and solely a vehicle to ATTACK people- calling someone chaatu, "depression ka dhanda karne waali" and going on national TV and calling Karan and Aditya Chopra "murderers" and "suicide gang" (hello? i thought her whole argument was that he DIDNT kill himself? But again, logic se kya lena dena)- then unfortunately that person loses all credibility and legitimacy in their argument.
And what locus standi does she or people who advocate for her have to talk about "bullying". I'm not even talking about her issues with Hrithik or Javed Akhtar or whoever- that's personal stuff. But for eg- so what if Deepika went to JNU? It may be a leftie place and it is not an ideology I endorse but last I checked it was still in India. So how dare she call Deepika anti-national for going there? Is that not a personal attack just because someone disagrees with her politically? (It's also an incredibly brain dead way of approaching
The simple point is this : words have MEANING and CONSEQUENCES. If you go on national TV and make certain allegations such as calling a group of your colleagues "murderers of SSR", claiming you are speaking the truth, then at least have the SPINE and the decency to back it up like an adult living in a civilised society, living in the rule of law. Otherwise you are making libelous and unverified claims like a coward who is settling personal scores.
The result so far? We are a) waiting for her to hand over the so called proof to the Mumbai police- she still hant cooperated with them or b) hand it over now to CBI enquiry in Bihar and c) if she cant do this, then give back her Padmashri
Obviously she's not going to do any of the above and I challenge any one to prove this wrong based on her actions so far.
Calling out someone on their LIES and deceitful claims is not bullying. And if someone continues propagating these falsehoods and lies, then sure, as you said, people will laugh and find it funny, but that person will eventually lose all credibility and face- which is what is happening. People watch her videos and take it as low grade entertainment. A warrior for truth and justice, she is not.
I am very much a citizen of this country and a former KR fan even, but it is obvious as day to anyone who is not a blind fan that she has milked this opportunity to ingratiate herself to the powers that be. She gives a rat's as* for SSR's death or the actual inquiry or the effects of nepotism for anyone except herself but sad that people will tie themselves up into knots to defend her bullying and self serving behaviour.
Current Affairs
Cricket
Jodha Akbar
11