Did Madhuri piss off KanGoli? - Page 5

I could never go past Sridevi's attrocious accent also she was the flagbearer of plastic surgery.

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

You telling me Sridevi was not glamourous in English Vinglish/Mom/Puli? She looked drop dead gorgeous, and the styling and make-up was LIT AF. I have to laugh.

Truth is, if Madhuri had done English Vinglish, she would have aced it too. She tried with Bucket List but that film was just awful.

Even Rekha tried with Super Nani, but it was a tone deaf attempt.

Sridevi was not glamorous in either Mom or English Vinglish though.

Originally posted by: RegressiveThug

Sridevi was not glamorous in either Mom or English Vinglish though.

If you don't find those GORGEOUS sari's and topnotch hair and make-up glamorous, then who am I to convince you otherwise.

Very amusing.

So, if a movie flops then the actors in the movie are not good actors.

Mom was released in about 1400 screens, could make only 36 crores with approx. 28 lakh footfalls.

Mom was a flop movie hence by logic of Sridevi fans Sridevi was a bad actor.

Tt was Sridevi who was trying the most to stay glamourous whichever way possible. Just see her latest pictures before her sad demise and there is nothing wrong in being glamourous .

It is funny to see Sridevi fans shifting goalposts.

Sridevi did not bring anything new to EV, it was a great role, not just MDN anybody would have cracked i.

Both are good as actors, beautiful and great dancers. I think kangana is just fan girl of Sridevi.

Dancing diva is all what Madhuri is known for,not her acting.She goes OTT in dramatic scenes.Her acting is so 90's.

Sridevi is a clear winner.

Hate to agree to the mad sisters in ANY issue, but this one's right. Sri has no comparison, had no comparison and will not have it ever either.

Dance, acting, aura - Sri tops it all.
Glamour - Madhuri takes the cake.

Reason why Madhuri is still here but almost close to not being relevant anymore. With Sri, good directors would wait for years for her one yes. So yeah, the difference matters.

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

If you don't find those GORGEOUS sari's and topnotch hair and make-up glamorous, then who am I to convince you otherwise.

You are a make up and saree person, so your knowledge for those things are not something I,( someone who is as.knowledgeable about these as Tiger Shroff about acting), will argue.

But I can't see how Sridevi in English Vinglish or Mom was glamourous, unless it is considered that unless you look total mess like Sanya M in Pathaka, you are glamorous. Sorry for me, glamorous roles are those were the emphasis of the role would be loud presentation of costumes, make up and looks overall, not a role where everything of the actor from custom, make up and look is as minimal and subtle as possible.

Anyways, we will never agree on Madhuri's acting skills. And I don't get this trying to make it like, if Madhuri got Sri's movies, she would have done much as good the job argument either.

If someone says, she is the biggest female superstar, I will agree, as even I believe so, because her prime saw her give the highest numbers of HGOTY. But Madhuri the actor to me, was an average to above average one. People can disagree, crib and cry(crib and cry part not directed to you, but Madhuri fans).

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

You telling me Sridevi was not glamourous in English Vinglish/Mom/Puli? She looked drop dead gorgeous, and the styling and make-up was LIT AF. I have to laugh.

Truth is, if Madhuri had done English Vinglish, she would have aced it too. She tried with Bucket List but that film was just awful.

Even Rekha tried with Super Nani, but it was a tone deaf attempt.

Glamor mom is diff from sexpot glamor. It is a fact. Or you could term any makeup as glamor.

Madhuri's main appeal was her sex appeal. She was a below average actress. Age does result in faded sex appeal. Hence her deficiencies are now glaring.

As for the comment if she did Mom... she didn't because no good director offered her such acting heavy stories, and there is a reason behind it. She wouldn't do well.

None of this is to deny Madhuri was a superstar. Heck, she made that silly Raja with flop Sanjay Kapoor a hit.

But when it comes to acting... Sri was ahead by miles.

Originally posted by: ponymo

It is the popular opinion. Sridevi was the true allrounder. Faaaar superior than Madhuri in acting and looks, and an equal in dance.

I agree with this. Sri Devi was the first real hero in that people would actually line up to go watch a movie b/c Sri Devi was in. Her Charlie Chaplin act was one of the finest performances I've ever seen in a leading leady.

Not to diminsh Madhuri, who I absolutely adore, but Sri Devi is something else altogether. The range alone that she showed in Lanhe going from a shy, village girl to flamboyant girl like damn!