Are the CVs turning Bajaj back to a grey character? DT Note Pg 15 - Page 7

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

Bajaj ke upar bill phaada tha , because he is the center of axis 😎 he separated a kid from to-be-father by marrying a pregnant lady ... aah those days 😆

Killing Pre and assuming she is alive somewhere with no confession from divers and separating mother child for 8 years , by the male lead is justified like how 😎

Prerna was equally bashed. Ab kyu nahi bataya. Tab kyu nahi bataya. Komolika ko expose karne ke baad kyu nahi bataya. All her fault and all and all and all. Matlab, the man doesn't even consider that he has had unprotected sex which could obviously lead to what it did, and the woman is supposed to run after him to tell him, dude remember the night we spent, it got me pregnant, how could you be so insensitive and marry someone else?

🤔

Originally posted by: Reemz11

Exactly man! Bajaj didn’t instigate this. Komo did and then Anurag thought ‘outside the box’ as Komo said 🤣 Even Komo didn’t tell Anurag to kill Prerna that’s the funny part, she told him to get Prerna out of his life. HE decided to romance Komo in front of Prerna, HE organised the death scene with the divers.

you can’t even blame Komo for this forget Bajaj 🤣

exactly ...

Komo told him to throw her out of their lives ...
Anurag decided to throw her off the bridge

Komo asked to think out of the box
Anurag thought to throw out of the world

Komo didn't ask for chumma chaati
Anurag decide to go with chance pe dance

He didn't even bother to take info from divers

ismein seriously blaming komo for his brain-faded phase is also absurd ,,. Bajaj toh dhoor tak nahin

Originally posted by: _charu_

Aisa kaunsa justification diya anurag ne 😆 cvs made him more lame , lazy and extremely foolish with this revelation.

Character being the best character or even a good character at this point in time was also not mentioned by me. Just talked about how Ekta has still kept Anurag the focus and I'm crediting that to Parth's portrayal.

Originally posted by: SheAish

Character being the best character or even a good character at this point in time was also not mentioned by me. Just talked about how Ekta has still kept Anurag the focus and I'm crediting that to Parth's portrayal.

Anurag bajaj and pre r the main characters why would she sideline any of them ? When I saw the first epi after promo , I said ek is going for the 4 month rehash of sindoor dupatta again..n see wohi ho gaya 😆 Iske baad may be she might do something with bajaj I I dont see chances right now. ..frankly how does it matter when the leads story is so shitty ? Usko theek karti nai, bajan or no bajaj is irrelevant . Audience want to see good drama , koi bhi kar raha ho

Originally posted by: _charu_

Anurag bajaj and pre r the main characters why would she sideline any of them ? When I saw the first epi after promo , I said ek is going for the 4 month rehash of sindoor dupatta again..n see wohi ho gaya 😆 Iske baad may be she might do something with bajaj I I dont see chances right now. ..frankly how does it matter when the leads story is so shitty ? Usko theek karti nai, bajan or no bajaj is irrelevant . Audience want to see good drama , koi bhi kar raha ho

*Sigh* Charu, behen, manlia...you are neutral and it makes no difference for you whether Parth gets to showcase his acting in front of ITV audiance for this long as the central character.....I'm a biased fan..so please let me rejoice in seeing his great acting and Ekta appreciating it enough to still keep him instead of going for a Prerish angle in the first round like they did in S1.

My simple point, even if he is grey or black, still it would be spicier than the soulmate story. Prerna and Anurag have no chemistry and it comes from someone who worshipped Parth literally from his previous show!

Grey, black, pink doesn’t matter. KSG as Bajaj is here to stay and provide momentum to the show!

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

separation of to be father and kid (when father is not even aware of the baby) is far more evil and gargantuan issue than separating a 2 day old baby and mom (for 8 long years )

understand the chronology Reema

This entire thread just says one thing : Bajaj is a God and every character is at his mercy. Nobody in KZK does one thing or move one finger without Bajaj's permission. That's the gist of all these theories and you know what, I AGREE. He's a grey God amongst these shadeless mortals who can't do anything on their own 😆 I accept this wholeheartedly!

The serial is actually interesting now. Every character has turned grey. Even Komo has a softer side as seen with her daughter. And I really enjoyed her episode on Friday, despite not having my fav anywhere close.

We all know that the characters can change overnight in this serial. So let's just enjoy each of our favourites, showing different shades.

Originally posted by: Reemz11

So what if Bajaj bribed the divers? Anurag didn’t want Prerna to know he arranged divers anyway. It makes no difference when Anurag himself wants Prerna to hate him.

About the papers, then Anurag still seperated a child and mother?! If he’s given Sneha up for adoption then that makes him more pathetic because he couldn’t keep the mother or the child with him because of Komo.

That's right, but still Prerna deserves to know that Anurag atleast kept divers and did not "kill" Sneha. Separating a mother from a child is no doubt a crime.But, killing or taking the life of a newborn, I feel is a much bigger crime. Atleast, if he has given up Sneha for adoption, then it proves that he did not take the life of a newborn, which Prerna is thinking.😊

Also, if Prerna came to know that atleast Anurag's appointed divers had come to rescue her, then probably some time later in these whole 8 years, she would have given a thought, as to why if Anurag's plan was to take her life, then why did he appoint divers? Pondering over this, might have led her to know the full truth.

I am 100% saying that what Anurag has done are murderous acts. But I also believe the victim deserves to know the full truth. After knowing the full truth, what decision the victim takes it's upto him/her. But if there is any person who is withholding the full truth from the victim, then I do believe that person is no less guilty than the killer himself/herself.😊