Sidnaaz-true or false - Page 27

Originally posted by: Uma2010

I didn’t say everybody who dislikes Sidnaaz haven’t dated 😕. But you brought in “lust” and I mentioned how dating funda happens and what you call lust, I choose to term as physical attraction, that’s all and I think it’s pretty essential and normal when any relationship kicks off. We have had sleazy couples like Ashmit and Veena. And that was lust, the kind you see it. Sana and Sid have never crossed any lines on the show nor do I think they will. As for attraction, we are nobody to prescribe what sort of relationships should kick off and what shouldn’t. Good for them if they are attracted to each other. If it sustains, good luck to them. As for viewers, we are free to see anything we want in them- even lust, as you feel it is and love, as I feel it is. But yes, all of us are entitled to our opinions.

U dint say everybody but everyone who doesn't like sidnaaz do find them lusty so if u say it to me it applies to everyone. Some even went on calling them tharki Budda and tharki bacchi.Some went on to say it's lusty so it makes them puke.

Moving on...

What’s the take here on Aarti exposing what’s really on Sid’s mind? Sidnaaz hai ki nahi? 😆

Originally posted by: Uma2010

Moving on...

What’s the take here on Aarti exposing what’s really on Sid’s mind? Sidnaaz hai ki nahi? 😆

What did Arti say?

Originally posted by: dondy

What did Arti say?

I know u love Sana . And he just nodded.☺️

Originally posted by: Uma2010

Moving on...

What’s the take here on Aarti exposing what’s really on Sid’s mind? Sidnaaz hai ki nahi? 😆

Haan haan hai😆

Lekin aj seems sid sana pe gusssa krne vala hai fr fighting with asim n bringing his name in all the argument

Moving on is better option when u realise ur mistake and there is nothing left to debate. It's simple it applies to me then it applies to all who called them lusty.

People who find their bond genuine will find them in a certain way while people who find their bond not genuine or a bond of convenience they will label them differently. It's as simple as that.

Originally posted by: CatcherInTheRye

glad u realised soon😆 to move on

Haan haan hai😆

Lekin aj seems sid sana pe gusssa krne vala hai fr fighting with asim n bringing his name in all the argument

👍🏼at Haan Haan hai. Now somebody show that clip bit to Sana 😉

Will Sid fight with Sana aaj? Chalo popcorn le aate hai aaj raat ke liye 😆. I don’t want him to bachi Sana too much- let her play responsibly at times. If she has dragged in Sid’s name again into the Asim equation, bhugto 🤷‍♀️. House dynamics will keep evolving. As long as it doesn’t shift fundamentals, I am all secure in Sidnaaz 😳

As much as I dislike both Sana and Sid, I do feel atleast Sid has very genuine feelings for Sana but he wants to tread carefully because somewhere he knows she’s very attached and attracted to Paras. Ofcourse there’s the game angle too as they both know SidNaz is a thing!

Sid has only connection with one person in the house and that’s Sana.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Moving on is better option when u realise ur mistake and there is nothing left to debate. It's simple it applies to me then it applies to all who called them lusty.

People who find their bond genuine will find them in a certain way while people who find their bond not genuine or a bond of convenience they will label them differently. It's as simple as that.

And so, feel free to watch Sidnaaz or not watch them through your morally policed lens, while I do through mine. Adieu.

There are some other unseen videos where HMs were playing khokho and another game. Sana wasn't there. Where was she