Ranbir Vs SRK : Better actor?

I like SRK more but I think Ranbir is the better actor.

There is no comparison only...Its Ranbir without a shadow of doubt...SRK is a very limited actor who mostly hammed through his way in a majority of his movies...Ranbir just in about 10 years has so much range already that SRK doesn't have in his entire filmography of 30+ years!

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

There is no comparison only...Its Ranbir without a shadow of doubt...SRK is a very limited actor who mostly hammed through his way in a majority of his movies...Ranbir just in about 10 years has so much range already that SRK doesn't have in his entire filmography of 30+ years!

What range? 😆 Srk has played negative character,action, comic, romantic, inspirational etc. Srk 30 is Miles ahead of Ranbir 10..

Both but I prefer srk in his prime.

Ranbir is a good actor but SRK is better and has shown more variety in terms of roles

SRK started his career with grey/questionable leading roles and then with a cemented villain era - he actively decided not to pursue romance films because his anti-hero image was successful for him. To the point that he initially rejected DDLJ, and when he accepted - well history speaks for itself. He was so convincing he successfully shed his anti-hero image and became the most sought after romantic lead. That is not an easy thing to do and it proves his range. Just because he chooses questionable scripts now because he might be comfortable with not pushing his limits, doesn't mean he's not the better actor, because he is. Raees and Fan are still recent movies and in both, he was commendable, in both he went back to the basics and was incredibly convincing.

Rk is a far better actor

Keeping all my disliking aside, SRK could have done soo much more. It's his knack for easy fame and mediocrity limited him to somewhat mid-level as an actor despite having such popularity. Also SRK has been hailed for all his badly acted roles like super hammy Darr to zero substance Don to mediocre Rahuls while his really good roles though few are less discussed outside 'intelluletual' forum..

The less said about Ranbir is better..What goes up goes down..but few comes down as fast as Ranbir. i liked him a lot once..He was good in WUS, Rocket Singh, Rajneeti..He got loads of publicity because of kapoor surname and faced no competition until a point.But after yjhd there is no movie of him worth discussing..more over whatever charm he had , he lost it now. Watching Ranbir now is tiring

I like srk more

Originally posted by: vena.cava.

SRK started his career with grey/questionable leading roles and then with a cemented villain era - he actively decided not to pursue romance films because his anti-hero image was successful for him. To the point that he initially rejected DDLJ, and when he accepted - well history speaks for itself. He was so convincing he successfully shed his anti-hero image and became the most sought after romantic lead. That is not an easy thing to do and it proves his range. Just because he chooses questionable scripts now because he might be comfortable with not pushing his limits, doesn't mean he's not the better actor, because he is. Raees and Fan are still recent movies and in both, he was commendable, in both he went back to the basics and was incredibly convincing.

Well said. SRK becoming such an iconic romantic hero after he played very negative & creepy characters shows his range already. I think Fan and Raees are his best movies this decade, he gave great performances in both. He should have done more of that type instead of Dilwale, JHMS etc. where he was wasted.