Obama VS John Mccain? - Page 4

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

of course in a country where education value is so low we have highly qualified PM not a bozo... and it shows in the current economic scenario as well that we are doing politically good as well...when was the last electuions??

actually the current PM who is highly qualified is made to dance like a clown(bozo by defination😆) at every whim of the sutradhar and that any nose-dripping kid on the street can tell you😆 for you that is good😉 excellent

Education does not buy you a backbone and it is proven😆 by your example of India where your high water mark expectations are just to make sure you dont have an election in less than 5 years😆

this post is not meant as an offense to Manmohan Singhji as a person I love and respect that man for the work he did before he became the PM

now lets get back to point talking about American electoral process😆

McCain's story is inspiring😊 and I think Mc Cain may win the election😊

BTW reg education of Politicians and the institutes they graduated from.......DOES NOT IMPACT ON THEIR P😃OLICIES AND ADMINISTRATION Much😛

Nehru,Indira Gandhi,Rajeev Gandhi....our own Rahul Gandhi😆....all are from Cambridge/Oxford University😛..It did'nt create much impact on these people's Political style.....

"Rajaneethi" is a different science which only some people can excel and this may not need any formal education in that science....Rajaneethi is a science of "learning by doing"😊.......

However, in general the alumni of the eminent universities are considered to be of much much higher level than people from other colleges......reason....those folks are intelligent and wise folks.....

Consider IIT's or IIM's in India..getting into these by JEE or CAT is not at all an easy task...only diamonds...(diamond like students ) get selected to those....😊

Even for universities like Cambridge,Harvard, Yale or MIT......best students get selected on Scholarship👏....

These people are definetly 100000000 times superior than ordinary janta, if one cannot accept this fact.....it just shows that they are jeaolous 😛..........I donno about other folks by thyself follow like a hutch company ad dog back of these intelligent folks..hoping to get any knowledge even in their harsh words or humour or any ordinary words😆

Wishes,

Myth

i prefer anyone winning other than mccain. ideally, i hope that obama will win.

Originally posted by: ummmmm

i prefer anyone winning other than mccain. ideally, i hope that obama will win.

lol. what's wrong with a guy too old to be able to wreak much havoc on anything? it's usually the young 'uns who seem to be getting into some mischief or the other.😉 and getting the country into one. 😊

Originally posted by: chatbuster

lol. what's wrong with a guy too old to be able to wreak much havoc on anything? it's usually the young 'uns who seem to be getting into some mischief or the other.😉 and getting the country into one. 😊

it doesn't matter how old he is. it's not like he's going to go out and physically cause chaos himself; he'll get the military to.

Originally posted by: ummmmm

it doesn't matter how old he is. it's not like he's going to go out and physically cause chaos himself; he'll get the military to.

again, the younger ones have had more failures on that score too. jfk had his bay of pigs. as for george jr., we dont need to be told. Who else? yes, jimmy carter was young too when he became prez. Had the iran fiasco. And clinton- cldnt even catch hold of osama when he was still running out loose in plain sight. maybe becaause he was too busy running around himself? i tell u, it's those hyper-active hormones at that age- u're thinking from all the wrong places😉😆

Originally posted by: chatbuster

again, the younger ones have had more failures on that score too. jfk had his bay of pigs. as for george jr., we dont need to be told. Who else? yes, jimmy carter was young too when he became prez. Had the iran fiasco. And clinton- cldnt even catch hold of osama when he was still running out loose in plain sight. maybe becaause he was too busy running around himself? i tell u, it's those hyper-active hormones at that age- u're thinking from all the wrong places😉😆

well, the truth is, none of the presidents mentioned were very young when they served as president. jimmy carter was 53, john f. kennedy was 44, and bill clinton was 47. so the "hyperactive" hormones you're talking about stopped for them way back when they were in their teens. so my point is, i don't think age has nearly as significant of an effect on a president's performance in office as you are making it out to be. i think it is more so the president's political views and wisdom (which i find mccain lacks) that determine how well the president's administration runs.

Originally posted by: ummmmm

well, the truth is, none of the presidents mentioned were very young when they served as president. jimmy carter was 53, john f. kennedy was 44, and bill clinton was 47. so the "hyperactive" hormones you're talking about stopped for them way back when they were in their teens. so my point is, i don't think age has nearly as significant of an effect on a president's performance in office as you are making it out to be. i think it is more so the president's political views and wisdom (which i find mccain lacks) that determine how well the president's administration runs.

well, i aint no biology man but there sure seems to be something biological then if not those hormones.😆 the grandfather types did do well- whether it was a reagan in terms of bringing around the fall of communism, or roosevelt in terms of getting the new deal. the 20 yrs plus extra they had seems to be the common factor separating them from the clintons, the jfks, the george ws, who cld talk the talk, but not walk it, in terms of performance. maybe tat's how they got that wisdom u are talking about?😉

Originally posted by: chatbuster

well, i aint no biology man but there sure seems to be something biological then if not those hormones.😆 the grandfather types did do well- whether it was a reagan in terms of bringing around the fall of communism, or roosevelt in terms of getting the new deal. the 20 yrs plus extra they had seems to be the common factor separating them from the clintons, the jfks, the george ws, who cld talk the talk, but not walk it, in terms of performance. maybe tat's how they got that wisdom u are talking about?😉

like many people, you seem to be the type to believe that the old ones are the wiser ones. i, as you can tell, disagree. yes, there are many old people who are wise, but i don't necessarily believe that wisdom comes with age. i think that wisdom comes with experience and knowledge of the outside world. just because you're old does not mean that you have experienced a lot in life and are, therefore, full of wisdom.

saying that, statistically speaking, i doubt that there is a high correlation between a president's age and his performance in office.

...but, of course, you can believe what you want.

Originally posted by: ummmmm

like many people, you seem to be the type to believe that the old ones are the wiser ones. i, as you can tell, disagree. yes, there are many old people who are wise, but i don't necessarily believe that wisdom comes with age. i think that wisdom comes with experience and knowledge of the outside world. just because you're old does not mean that you have experienced a lot in life and are, therefore, full of wisdom.

saying that, statistically speaking, i doubt that there is a high correlation between a president's age and his performance in office.

...but, of course, you can believe what you want.

Perhaps it would be good if you could give specific examples where Mccain hasnt shown wisdom in situations or same can go with CB😆 can make argument stronger. You have about 30-40 years of situations to plow thru😉