Originally posted by: Star_girl
Urmi, Yes. SKT shows are trash. His trash StarBharat made me want to kill myself. Then I tried his trash Ashok, which made me never want to watch historicals again. I honestly don't mind some historical inaccuracies personally, I liked Jodha Akbar for the first few months. It was a bubblegum historical with no connection to history and didn't take itself seriously. SKT shows, however. They have such an inherent dishonesty in them and take themselves to seriously. Additionally, I hate how whitewashed his characters are. I dislike his shows.
Ashok is Contiloe (Abhimanyu singh) show.
That guy is marginally better due to non bragging attitude.
Exactly.
This is the reason I liked Jodha akbar too.
It was fun till the first few months.
The main problem with brand SKT shows is he brags too much about his work and one tends to get disappointed more than they should be when a product that was supposed to be groundbreaking comes out to be nonsensical instead of a product that people didn't think about.
The making ofs of Swastik shows are way interesting than the actual shows.
Also SKT tries to make his viewers undergo torturous moral science lessons in the name of entertainment by making his protagonists give long lectures about women empowerment, love and in case of Porus , deshbhakti. 🤢
He also claims that his versions of myth
/histos are hundred percent authentic but they are all hundred percent fake in reality.
His shows are also extremely poorly researched.
In Porus , they showed Kathakali dancers and Malaripayattu fighters performing in a north Indian kingdom In 320 BC😕
My hatred for Sid knows no bounds. 😆
Edited by -Urmi- - 8 years ago