#Kanganaisoverparty - HR and KR controversy ALL POSTS HERE ONLY - Page 86

Originally posted by: DriftInfinitely

Yeah, it's hilarious hearing him call everything that happened a positive experience because he learnt so much.😆The holier than thou attitude is just laughable. And as someone pointed out in a previous post, he used to respond to questions about Kangana as if she's dirt, and has changed that now probably due to his PR's advice.

Originally posted by: Nova19

I took your post to imply that Hrithik or his PR had planted the blind. Apologies if it didn't. Please show me links to Kangana Hrithik rumors or blinds in 2013.

Edit: A thought just occurred to me...so why do you think Kangana attributed the A3 rumors to an ex trying to get her attention?

Originally posted by: ponymo

Yikes, some of those tweets of Rangoli are so crass and below the belt. If her intent is to fight Kangana's cause, she is doing her no favours; quite the opposite actually.

I watched a couple of snippets of the CNN interview yesterday, where Hrithik denies infidelity too. Sure, all those affairs with Kareena and Barbara Mori were also made up. And yes, the cause for his divorce with Sussanne is also "inspiring". So positive man! Wonder why he felt the need to crucify Sussanne by making it seem like she walked away despite getting undivided love from him, since she was having a "fling with Arjun Rampal"... which caused his own fans to abuse and s**t-shame Sussanne back in 2014.

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

Originally posted by: d2rocks

If you had seen his older interviews, you will know that he terms everything happening around him as positive... be it his stammering issue, surgery during bang bang or any unfortunate event... he strives to send positive vibes always. That's only if you have seen his older interviews but why would you. You wouldn't want your delusions to evade, would you?

Originally posted by: Mimi_

Why doesn't everybody who asks this question go back one more step and ask the question why did kangana make that silly ex comment why why why? If she hadn't made that comment none of this would've happened either.

Here is what Yami Gautam has to say on Hrithik-Kangana controversy:

I am usually not very vocal on social media, but I am making an exception today, since as a woman, what I am seeing right now terrifies me.

This is concerning the matter surrounding two of the biggest stars in our industry. I have, fortunately, had the opportunity to work with one of them. However, I am not writing this as a co-star or even as a friend. I am writing this as a woman and a concerned citizen of the country, and I will try to get my point across as succinctly and as objectively as possible.

I am no legal expert. And I am not privy to the details of the case. I know what has been reported in the media, and I am all for good, honest reporting. However, somehow, the tussle has turned into a gender war, with a certain faction of the society having already declared the man guilty. People have presumed that since he is a man, he must be the guilty party, since that is how it has always been. Men have oppressed women in one way or another for centuries, and it's being presumed that it is the same in this case, too.

And that's dangerous. Whatever happened to innocent, until proven guilty? Whatever happened to letting the law take its own course? Yes, a lot of times, at least in this country, we have take to the streets to get justice. But that's not the case here. The police is investigating, and both the parties are privileged enough that they can represent themselves in court and fight this out legally. Sadly, our law and order is sort of classist, but let's not digress.

Here is why this vilification of a man based on make-believe evidence is dangerous. If the gender-card is allowed to take precedence over facts and objectivity, it will be a serious blow to the on-going efforts of getting women an equal standing with the opposite sex. If this baseless trial-by-media is allowed to continue, where one party has been presumed to be guilty, there is a good likelihood that people might lose faith in this equal-rights-for-all movement that has picked up momentum in India only in recent years.

I am not exonerating anyone here. I am also not suggesting malice by any one party. All I am saying is, let's not make it a fight between genders. Let's keep it a fight between two people who may or may not have corresponded in the past. Let the facts be unearthed and until then, let's reserve our judgements.
Just because this is a fight between a man and a woman does not mean it has to be a fight between genders. Making everything a gender issue can easily distract us from addressing legit sexist issues that plague our society.

Originally posted by: astha36

The way he has talked in Republic's interview, he does seem not-so-genuine or following his PR, because normally people don't think or talk like that. But I find it hilarious that this is being used to bash him when the question is whether he's been harassed or not. I mean everybody is flawed but in this particular case, it does seem like he's not wrong. How does it matter what the reason for his divorce was or whether he's been a cheater or whatever. He might be trying to sway impressionable people through this persona *if* it is fake. I haven't followed him elsewhere to know what he is really like. So, if one is not impressionable, don't be swayed, but at least look at the case for what it is.