Original of this FAKE pic, please... - Page 10

Originally posted by: Nova19

If kangana was sending these emails to a fake person who SHE THOUGHT was HR, then how did the "real" HR put his hand on them?

Answering this question may be the reason for my birth.

Originally posted by: hantel

Someone on Twitter replied Rangoli with this pic. Was Hrithik also having an affair with Gauri Khan?

Originally posted by: ChadDimera

It starting to seem like Kanganas crazy is spreading 😆 😆

Originally posted by: Mascarpone

About 6 months till the day of KJo's party. So from late 2013 to early 2014.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

Like always ...once more...I feel that Kangna FELT like she was having an affair with Hritik...those pics mean nothing...its just some drunk people snuggling with each other to get their pics taken...have seen much worse pics from parties...

Having said that the hypocrisy of some people is unbelievable ...that one pic of PC with her pinky in SRK's pocket and then PC talking about some damn branded jacket where she didn't even name anyone...and some of these same people bashed SRK for pages...and yet here these intimate pics and Kangna naming HR over and over mean nothing to the same people...amazing..👏

Originally posted by: anoosree

A more logical theory, what if the imposter was Kangana herself, she made a fake account in Hrithik's name and sent herself the email and claimed that Hrithik sent it. Is that not the reason why she is not giving her laptops and phones to the cyber police when they wanted to find the identity of the imposter.

Had she turned on her gadgets to the police a year back and proved the imposter was indeed Hrithik then I am sure Hrithik would be sitting in jail by this time. Why is that brave, bold and bindaas Kangana afraid to submit her gadgets to the cyber cell, when it would have only proved her claims right???

Don't take me wrong, you are free to believe whatever you choose to...it's just that when people start accusing a human based on speculations or blind devotion toward their favorite celeb. It really saddens me. Even the law of our land says, it's ok for 100 criminals to go scotfree but no innocent man should be convicted.

A man has been harassed was past two yrs for no proven faults of his and when he stands up against his tormentor, we ask him to provide the proof and lady in question doesn't need any validation. It's just enough she speaks. Is she God almighty...