Originally posted by: Samanalyse
As this Khatri arc came to a head, it touched on one of the core themes of the show: you can control only your own actions, but not their consequences. What this means, and an important lesson for all of the characters, is that good intentions do not absolve you of the consequences of your actions. At this point in time, all of the characters hide behind good intentions to justify the many upsets and upheavals they have caused, from Sona and Dev to Ishwari and Bijoy. But by introducing the results of Ishwari's crime, the writers are complexifying this entire question, and showing how being a victim in one situation does not absolve you of being a perpetrator in another. In more subtle ways, this is what Dev and Sona learnt about the split -- the fact that they were hurt and broken didn't mean that they didn't also hurt and break the other. Each of them saw themselves as the victim of the other's injustice until they understood how they had been unjust themselves; that is the crossroads that Ishwari is at now.
It is not difficult to imagine Ishwari's thought process when she stole those jewels. She might even have asked for the money outright (as is common with household help) and been denied because their family had to focus on the wedding expenses at the time. Seeing the excess of expenditure that usually comes along with weddings, Ishwari probably thought that there was no end to this family's wealth. What would it matter if she stole some jewellery? I wouldn't even be surprised if there was some anger and bitterness there, seeing that family enjoy their wealthy while she struggled to put together the basic necessities for her kids. And probably in a desperate and emotional moment, Ishwari convinced herself that this was the right thing to do... because she was doing it with good intentions, surely she wouldn't be punished.That is precisely where she went wrong. True that she didn't intend to send that family into ruin, but she did, and she was forced to live with that fact. Honestly, what bothers me most about the whole thing is not the theft itself (though that was categorically wrong), it is the fact that Ishwari didn't make atonement her first priority once she had the chance to. If she had, she would have done anything in her power to find that family, including confessing her sins to Dev and falling in his esteem so that he could seek them out with all the tools he had as a successful businessman. Instead, she put her godly image in Dev's eyes above the truth. As long as Dev saw her as perfect, the truth could be pushed into a dark corner of her mind and ignored. That reality played out quite literally in her dream sequence yesterday. And it is this hypocrisy that allowed Khatri to exploit both her and the family she worked for all of these years.This explains a lot about Ishwari's character and her insecurities (as you all have beautifully discussed over the past few pages). She clung to the title of "ma" because she knew that even if she couldn't be a perfect individual, she could be the perfect mother. As an individual one can and should fault Ishwari for her crime, but as a mother, it is easier, especially with the narrative of divine widow-mothers in our culture, dismiss her crime as a "sacrifice" of her own dignity and integrity for her children. The moment Ishwari stops being "Ma," she actually has to contend with the fact that she is a criminal. And this is precisely the conflict that Dev is stuggling with now. Should he be grateful to his mother for how far she went to ensure that he succeeded, or should he damn the woman who committed a categorically wrong act that resulted in the tragic dissolution of a once happy and stable family, a woman who bit the hand that fed her, and then fed him lies about being ethically and morally sound?I think the key here is for all the characters to understand that an individual is not defined by a single role or action. Yesterday, mean-dream-Dev told Ishwari, "tu ma nahin hai chor hai," but does being a theif negate Ishwari's role as a mother? Conversely, can even the most perfect motherhood cancel out the fact that she was indeed a thief? No. All these years, she tried to hide behind the "ma" moniker, and made that her whole identity to avoid facing the truth about herself as a person. Now, both she and Dev have to face the fact that she is a person cannot be defined in such a simple way, and deal with that reality. That family is not obliged to forgive Ishwari and she may have to live with that too.Special mention for Supriyaji who was absolutely brilliant in yesterday's episode! The way she said, "memsaab" when she heard the voice was gut-wrenching and really gave you a feel for the destitute but ruthlessly ambitious woman that Ishwari once was. I am loving this incredible fleshing out of her very complex and beautifully written character.