Is Art a divine entity? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Believe

Picasoo and MF Hussain make me so confuse 😕 😉 😛

why is this confusing? This is such a nice picture...😊

"

Originally posted by: Morning_Dew

I always have this question in my mind .. why a piece of art which is accredited as an "ART" most of the time not popular among masses. In other word preferences of masses are usually not considered "True Art" .

What is your opinion............😊

Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. I have never understood why art has been categorized into an elitist category for the classes and not masses. There are some so called pieces of art that I never get. In my world something that brightens my day or expands my horizon will be true art, I could care less for the elitist definitions.

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

why is this confusing? This is such a nice picture...😊

"

Ya its Divine😆😉😛 Aunty with Chair😛

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. I have never understood why art has been categorized into an elitist category for the classes and not masses. There are some so called pieces of art that I never get. In my world something that brightens my day or expands my horizon will be true art, I could care less for the elitist definitions.

@bold you said it😊 ... Pic of aunty that Qwerty pasted some can look at it for hours and end up appaulding or buying it for millions... well confront them for being insane one will get thier answer 😉😆.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. I have never understood why art has been categorized into an elitist category for the classes and not masses. There are some so called pieces of art that I never get. In my world something that brightens my day or expands my horizon will be true art, I could care less for the elitist definitions.

Most of the elitist art is commodity. I wonder if elites themselves understand or appreciate any of the expensive art they acquire for its artistic pleasure and truly justify the price they paid. 😉 I can appreciate MichaelAngelo and Da Vinci art but not Van Gogh , Picasso or MFH. The only reason I can think of someone paying millions for a piece of art is that there will be another down the road who will pay double that to acquire it.

Originally posted by: raj5000

@bold you said it😊 ... Pic of aunty that Qwerty pasted some can look at it for hours and end up appaulding or buying it for millions... well confront them for being insane one will get thier answer 😉😆.

Picasso's are a master piece... Just a general theory of relativity is.. It doesnt require masses to recognize it as long as people who matter understand...😊. beautiful art, music, science all are a part of serious perspecitve not coffee table chat...😆

Now if you cant call this a master-piece.then you should really seek out potrait or landscape painting. Sometimes form is more important than content and which is why surrealism, cubism..etc is so popular....

Originally posted by: persistence

querty, feel like giving you a hug. 😳 soumya is missing. 😳 😆

Thank you...😊

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

An artist survives for appreciation.... so many a times the art will tend to reflect that... some extra-ordinary ones like Van Gogh... end up devastated since their belligerent compulsiveness to their aesthetics is totally over-looked by generations of their time...

Art is absolute... but if the artist wants to experience their rewards they better respond to the expectations of the masses but if they feel exalted with the art and believe is perfection in expression of the nature they run the risk of being rejectd by their generation...😊

well said 😊

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

[

I fail to understand the beauty of these sunflowers.of Vangogh......my paintings are better than this😉😛....Hmm! Jatayu uncle of the forum..likes this painting somuch that this used to be his AV for 2 years😊

😆 This is one of my fav too

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Picasso's are a master piece... Just a general theory of relativity is.. It doesnt require masses to recognize it as long as people who matter understand...😊. beautiful art, music, science all are a part of serious perspecitve not coffee table chat...😆

Now if you cant call this a master-piece.then you should really seek out potrait or landscape painting. Sometimes form is more important than content and which is why surrealism, cubism..etc is so popular....

Again well said Qwerts.

What I believe , there is no boundry to arts , it is just a way of expression and if it satisfy sense of aesthetics of people , no matter who , if masses why not if a group then what's wrong in it ..... When I was a kid I always laughed over the paintings on trucks and buses back home , but now I take it as part of culture and enjoy it in a big picture of society where it exists . I may not like to keep such paintings in my home where I may prefere something closer to my own perceptions 😊