Jodha Akbar 34-36: Shaahi Shaadi - Page 13

Originally posted by: Donjas

So glad to see you back. In my opinion, Livanov is the best Holmes, and that Sherlock Holmes series is the best depiction of that era.

http://bigcinema.tv/series/sherlok-holms-i-doktor-vatson-sobaka-baskerviley-tv.html

and other movies here.

http://bigcinema.tv/tag/

Originally posted by: jayaks02

Does anyone else think Abul Fazl goes in a worship mode while talking about Biography of Akbar ?
I think he wrote a too one-sided positive aspects only.

Even Chittor he paints as a hero's valour only even though the damage was enormous.

But I can understand this POV as he was probably much in awe of Emperor even though he himself was highly highly qualified. May be he did not want to lose the coveted position and wrote always +ve version which Akbar may have approved as he also wanted to leave a +ve story for posteriority.

Originally posted by: jayaks02

Does anyone else think Abul Fazl goes in a worship mode while talking about Biography of Akbar ?
I think he wrote a too one-sided positive aspects only.

Even Chittor he paints as a hero's valour only even though the damage was enormous.

But I can understand this POV as he was probably much in awe of Emperor even though he himself was highly highly qualified. May be he did not want to lose the coveted position and wrote always +ve version which Akbar may have approved as he also wanted to leave a +ve story for posteriority.

Originally posted by: devkidmd

Prem, whether Akbar had a love life or not is totally beside the point. The point is that when one throws information freely out there for everyone to read he or she must at least make sure that it is close to accurate.. if not 100% accurate. Even in your clarification you have wrong information.

Heer Kunwar aka Jodha married Akbar in 1562.

Akbar married the princesses of Jaisalmer and bikaner in 1570 or thereabouts. This is from the original source called the Akbarnama.

Telling people to refer to a fictional biography of Akbar written by an European in the 21st century is not the best reference.

I rest my case.

Devki

PS: Calling a ruler of Akbar's achievements and caliber a casanova and a womaniser is the most degrading, demeaning and insulting thing to say about him.

Originally posted by: alffim

Sorry, until I found a version with English subtitles. I Ask then to look my daughter. for the present Russian variant: It is "the hound of the Baskervilles" (1981)

http://bigcinema.tv/series/sherlok-holms-i-doktor-vatson-sobaka-baskerviley-tv.html

and other movies here.

http://bigcinema.tv/tag/

Originally posted by: Donjas

Shymala, this is what you are looking for- http://www.amazon.co.uk/Adventures-Sherlock-Complete-Collection-SUBTITLES/dp/B00110FB5W/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1443800976&sr=8-2&keywords=Adventures+of+Sherlock+Holmes+dr+Watson

I have ordered several times from Amazon.uk, the service is dependable

In my opinion, the price is too high, that is why I went the torrent route. I can guide you through the steps.

Originally posted by: Coolpree

@ blue: Akbar was not a one woman man. That I can accept. But Womaniser??? That implies a deep disrespect for women. Just a cursery look at his life highlights how deeply he respects the women around him. From the Sati incident, the power and respect his mother, aunt and wives held, from the religious freedom granted to his non muslim wives...It is impossible to use these insulting words for him.

Just because he had a large Harem does not make him a womanizer. And by that same token, the size of his Harem and his repeated marriages does not in anyway negate the love he may have had for one of his earlier wives.