So much sadness - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

25

Views

3.2k

Users

9

Likes

83

Frequent Posters

tellygeek thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: aparnauma

If Ira Meenu Alok show meanness to Anandi it is CVs fault and it is nothing to do with defect in their personalities or their tendency to play blame game

If Anandi does something -things go wrong because she was focused on helping a helpless woman and a child - it is her foolishness, carelessness and nothing to do with CVs
If Shiv decides to take on that terrorist despite the presence of ATS officer and police force and pays with his life without ever bothering to think about his family and his children who are going to be left fatherless then it is all to do with martyrdom and it has got nothing to do with CVs



Every move is CVs doing, characters are nothing but puppets in their hands 😊.

One fine day, they suddenly show side characters behaving awkwardly like how Ira, Meenu and Alok are doing. It seemed awkward because we don't expect them to change overnight especially after how they took care of Anandi after Shiv's demise.

What Shiv and Anandi did, didn't feel awkward, they were true to their characters. But both scenes were hurriedly shown with a goal oriented approach hence not convincing. And an expected progressive transformation in Anandi's character based on her vast experience is sorely missed..
Hence both Shiv, Anandi cases looked like inviting trouble as against mature handling of situations.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#12
Defending rubbish - Well if people sit and watch what is shown and come here to dissect and analyse so much about every little thing that was shown and come up with so many faults - I am sure whatever so called rubbish that is being shown must be worth their time too.
I don't know about others if I didn't care for what was being shown I stop watching it.I have tried to watch n no of shows that came up and a few episodes is enough to tell me that they were rubbish and not worth my time.Not only do I not watch those shows I don't spend time dissecting as to what is that is so trashy and rubbish about those shows
Obviously they want to raise a debate about self interests Vs desire and dedication to help others so they came up with this.
Social activists and their familes are often targets of people disgruntled by their actions and even if he chased Anandi and kidnapped the baby from her home people would have found a way to criticise Anandi for not thinking about her kids and family.
-----------------------------
Well I don't think Ira Meenu Alok's basic nature had changed - they are always into blaming somebody or other when things go wrong for them.
When they got to know that Sanchi fell for someone who they thought was not suitable for her they screamed at Sanchi without even wondering for once where they went wrong in bringing up Sanchi
They have been either yelling at her or indulging her.They don't question their role
When the engagement broke and subsequently they got to know that their little angel is no angel at all. What was their reaction? Just to ignore the fact that she even exists - why did they never stop to think where they went wrong - Ira grandly apologised to the world that she was sorry that she gave birth to Sanchi - Is that how a mother should react?
Why were they so harsh with foolish Sanchi? Only because she brought disrepute to the family with her foolishness.Otherwise they were willing to ignore Sanchi;s nonsensical acts calling it childishness without ever thinking that childishness doesn't ever go as far as to make others lives difficult.
When things go wrong they only rant - it is always Daddu or Shiv who made them see sense
So how different is it this time?
Sumi - did her nature change? She only wanted to bring a bahu who was educated and shehari simply because her son left the bahu they have for educated career minded girl - I know that she was bashed so much but I never bashed her.She only did what she thought was right.Yes she was irritating but I don't think she has done anything to be hated so much. At times just like Shekhars she too went over board
Similarly Shekhars are the most irritating lot but I never thought they have done anything worthy of hating them.for them their family and their khoon come first and then only everything else comes and that is something they have demonstrated ample no of times.
This is what is at least I understood from what they have shown of Sumi Ira Meenu Alok If people hate them it is their way of over reacting I only found them irritating at times
Edited by aparnauma - 11 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
I said this on another thread.

Sadness accompanies her as a shadow and losing Nandini could have happened even at her home. The goons could have entered the house with guns and kidnapped her. Then also Ira and Meenu would have blamed anandi that her social service is responsible for that
leavesandwaves thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
The thing is we never take a woman's work seriously. If she commits mistakes all hell breaks lose.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: tellygeek



Every move is CVs doing, characters are nothing but puppets in their hands 😊.

One fine day, they suddenly show side characters behaving awkwardly like how Ira, Meenu and Alok are doing. It seemed awkward because we don't expect them to change overnight especially after how they took care of Anandi after Shiv's demise.

What Shiv and Anandi did, didn't feel awkward, they were true to their characters. But both scenes were hurriedly shown with a goal oriented approach hence not convincing. And an expected progressive transformation in Anandi's character based on her vast experience is sorely missed..
Hence both Shiv, Anandi cases looked like inviting trouble as against mature handling of situations.

In both instances - Shiv and Anandi are being just themselves
Shiv instead of letting the police and ATS officer take on the terrorist while he focussed on helping people to move away from the place took on the terrorist we can say that he too lost his objectivity and paid a price for it and his family is facing the consequnces
Anandi did the same thing - thought she could handle the situation and She and Nandiini are paying the price.
731627 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#16
after long time daddu strongly supported anandi .though he supported anandi many time but that support was not strong enough but in yesterday episode daddu really stand nicely for anandi .the way daddu defence anandi was just superb daddu might have feel pani sir ke upar jaa raha hai now no more

it is not like that just because he is supported anandi he has become great , he become great because he fight for truth and his each and every word about anandi is true , there is nothing false in it .hope daddu screw tight anup too

anandi amol scene is very touching , love the way amol that he trying to reduce the pain of anandi by saying nandini jahan kahi bhi hongi log uska khayal rakh rahe honge she is sweet that everybody wil love her .after shiv death amol has become more responsible toward anandi and at such young he is so responsible it is very amazing

731627 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#17
daddu has give perfect example of shiv in defence of anandi
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves


Sumitra was terribly vitriolic towards Ganga.10 times more than Ira and Meenu.


I think that vitriolic behaviour is more to convince herself that Ganga is not right for her son rather than anything else.

That time whole Singh family was busy comparing Ganga with Anandi and busy finding similarities that used to irk her a lot.
Now their son left the choice of bride to them - She wanted to do the right thing for her son by getting him the kind of wife her son wanted - They couldn't find any other girl who is from a good family educated and city bred and what's more Sanchi and her family knew all about her son.In her eyes there couldn't be any other better than Sanchi who was educated know about J's past and what's more because of the alliance the relationship between Singhs and Shekhars wil be even more strong.

But at times she did go overboard while taking out her frustrations on Ganga.
Missesha thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

The thing is we never take a woman's work seriously. If she commits mistakes all hell breaks lose.

I do not agree to this.
If you are a first generation working woman or a woman involved in a work that involves some kind of risks, then it is the duty of the woman too to take time and convince her family about the type of work she does, risks involved, benefits involved, why you are interested in this work and what it means to you. Then only the family will be in a position to understand the depth of your dedication and sacrifice.

Ira / Meenu are not like DB, who are hell bent on finding problems with Anandi. They are good open-minded people, who always do not think the way Anandi does, but are open to support her provided Anandi also takes time to put forward her thoughts.

Does Anandi do that? She just jumps from one decision to another whether it is work related or personal. And therefore if Anandi's mistake has caused a huge loss to Shekhars, she will be questioned.

Why come up with general statements that a woman's wok is never taken seriously. Everyone's work / decision is taken seriously, provided the person makes it a point to explain and convince.


Edited by Missesha - 11 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#20
If a man is earning well. the woman going for work is not taken seriously and her job is considered as superficial in some families. They just indulge her. But those families want the woman to give her job second priority, not first while in men's case it is different. Especially in traditional families.

I must appreciate shiv for standing upto her and her social work throughout and even he could not change the family perception.

They blamed her social work more than her going with the child to such a venue.

Why did they not blame Shiv for doing the work of police and other security forces? Did they blame his Collectorship?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".