Fake marriage concept is very disturbing - Page 11

Originally posted by: i-me-myself

Fake marriage thing is already stretched a lot...

And whenever the truth gets revealed...it will be most difficult time for Ragini.

While I agree that faking a marriage is not a good thing, I also believe Ragini doesn't owe Neil any explanations. When the truth does come out, I don't see why she would have to justify anything to him.

Originally posted by: inlieu

While I agree that faking a marriage is not a good thing, I also believe Ragini doesn't owe Neil any explanations. When the truth does come out, I don't see why she would have to justify anything to him.

Ofcourse,she dont need to give any explanation but what she commented about Neil and Nivedita as "Najayaz" is applied to her too..she is travelling in the same boat as them.(i know Nivedita is negative and aman is positive,but thats not important here when you are just talking about jayaz and najayaz).So he has no right to say that as first she need to look herself,for what she is doing,and also imagine if the fake marriage is revealed to her kids and Jignesh family members,then no one will point fingures at Neil and Nivedita.

I hope they will solve it before Nishis marriage,or else i can already see Ragini in big and deep trouble during Nishis marriage.Dont forget Jignesh grandmom already enquired about aman.

Ofcourse she does not owe him an explanation..

Originally posted by: RonitPallaviNR

Yes she does owe him an explanation...just like she keeps asking him whats his rishta with nivi..calling it najayaz 😆

he could be in a live in with her..why does she judge him 😳

Originally posted by: poetic

Or maybe Ragini and Nachiket could give it another shot and check to see if living in works for them 😆

If I'm right in supposing that Ekta means this to be a mature love story with emphasis on the main leads being parents first and partners second, then this facade of a non-existent marriage is so uncalled for.
It reminds me of some of the M&B romances I've read when I was younger where the characters in their 2os pretend in a similar manner to be dating/engaged/married just to make the other person jealous. Even in my youth, I found that so childish.

With a 40-something couple, it's plainly ridiculous!

If a story has to be based on such a flimsy premise, then it may not work.
Like I read in some post a few days back, it's ludicrous to expect the audiences to believe that someone as smart as Neil (as he is being projected) should fall for such a falsehood. Body language is a dead giveaway for one thing.

My grouse against the writers is that they have undermined the whole story by taking this nonsensical path to nowhere and still expect the audience to willingly suspend disbelief .

Originally posted by: pippa

If I'm right in supposing that Ekta means this to be a mature love story with emphasis on the main leads being parents first and partners second, then this facade of a non-existent marriage is so uncalled for.
It reminds me of some of the M&B romances I've read when I was younger where the characters in their 2os pretend in a similar manner to be dating/engaged/married just to make the other person jealous. Even in my youth, I found that so childish.

With a 40-something couple, it's plainly ridiculous!

If a story has to be based on such a flimsy premise, then it may not work.
Like I read in some post a few days back, it's ludicrous to expect the audiences to believe that someone as smart as Neil (as he is being projected) should fall for such a falsehood. Body language is a dead giveaway for one thing.

My grouse against the writers is that they have undermined the whole story by taking this nonsensical path to nowhere and still expect the audience to willingly suspend disbelief .

hahahahaha you are so right..